hehehe, I never reboot after installing every single program....probably why i struggle to keep my rig stable.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
InfoWorld Windows XP performance analysis
Collapse
X
-
I really don´t like XP, it´s a dog. I haven´t XPerienced any speed-up compared to my 98se, not even booting.
I´ve found that some hardware, e.g. my external USB modem, doesn´t work (only got w2k drivers), and a lot of software won´t run. And when XP runs into trouble and don´t boot there is no easy way out like the "scanreg /restore" option in 98se from the command prompt. I haven´t been able to restore either manually or automagically to the point where it actually works, so the only option left has been to reinstall from scratch, whereby all settings are lost. With 98se you can reinstall without losing anything, this is not the case with XP - maybe you can and I´m to stupid.
So I´ll stay for now with my 98se, which is very stable (!). Crappy software sometimes **** it up, but that´s easily rectified.
rubank
p.s I run an AthlonXP 1700+, KT266A mobo and 512 mb DDR
Comment
-
11% slower to me means my long DVD formatted MPEG's end up taking 11 hours instead of 10 and that exporting image sequences of long 3D animations will likewise suffer.
NOT acceptable.
Dr. MordridDr. Mordrid
----------------------------
An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.
I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps
Comment
-
Originally posted by Duty
mdhome - > CD-RW support is there from the get go. I have been using it for a few weeks for video editing and so far love it. Rip raw footage from the vid camera and burn it to a disk for backup. Works lovely.
Jeff
ps why the Java sign? Are you a developer?
regards MDInterests include:
Computing, Reading, Pubs, Restuarants, Pubs, Curries, More Pubs and more Curries
Comment
-
I really don´t like XP, it´s a dog. I haven´t XPerienced any speed-up compared to my 98se, not even booting.
Strange... with a system like yours, you should notice the difference. I don´t give a damn about booting times, that´s a load of marketing crap people try to shove down our throats (although XP is quite fast at that).
As I stated before, on my LOW-END machine, XP performs TWICE as fast as W98 or Millennium. Word XP loads up in 2 seconds. Photoshop 6 loads in 70% of the time it would take in W98/Millennium, as Freehand 9.0 and Illustrator. Internet Explorer loads in half the time. I mean, EVERYTHING is faster and smoother. And I tend to keep my system tidy and optimized (when I had that Millennium crap and now). Even the harddisks are less noisy.
Oh, and it´s way lot more stable (probably the most important thing). Its memory management and hardware detection is light years ahead of W9x/Millennium.
I´m not working for Microsoft, but XP (and W2K) is the OS that has more to offer, no question about that. It´s not even comparable to 98 or Millennium. It´s WAY better, and you don´t have to be a genius to realize that. Of course, there are a few systems in which you can´t see a difference, but that can happen for dozens other reasons.Last edited by Alec; 21 November 2001, 15:10.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mdhome
Thanks for the info Jeff.
ps why the Java sign? Are you a developer?
regards MD
Fun stuff.
Jeff-We stop learning when We die, and some
people just don't know They're dead yet!
Member of the COC!
Minister of Confused Knightly Defence (MCKD)
Food for thought...
- Remember when naps were a bad thing?
- Remember 3 is the magic number....
Comment
-
There are always two sides to every story, I guess:
Comment
-
Does the Win'98 version of MS Office run on XP, or would I have to buy an XP version of Office too?My rig: P4 3.0GHz; Asus P4C800E; 1GB DDR 3200; AIW Radeon 9800 Pro; WD 120GB SATA; Plextor DVD burner; Liteon DVD reader; Audigy 2ZS; Logitech Z560 4.1; NEC FE991SB
Kid's rig: AMD XP 1600+; 512MB ram; GF4 Ti4600; Maxtor 60GB; Plextor CD burner; Sony DVD reader; SB Live; Cambridge 4.1 speakers; NEC FE991SB
Other kid's rig: Athlon 2700+; ASUS A7N8X mobo; 512MB PC3200 ram; GF4 Ti4600; Maxtor 80GB; SB Live; Cambridge 2.1; NEC FE991SB; Liteon DVD-ROM
Comment
-
That's good to hear -- about Office2000 being compatible.
I just ordered a new system yesterday and chose XP as the OS, then realized that the $200 Office2000 that I use extensively (for work related stuff) may not be compatible.My rig: P4 3.0GHz; Asus P4C800E; 1GB DDR 3200; AIW Radeon 9800 Pro; WD 120GB SATA; Plextor DVD burner; Liteon DVD reader; Audigy 2ZS; Logitech Z560 4.1; NEC FE991SB
Kid's rig: AMD XP 1600+; 512MB ram; GF4 Ti4600; Maxtor 60GB; Plextor CD burner; Sony DVD reader; SB Live; Cambridge 4.1 speakers; NEC FE991SB
Other kid's rig: Athlon 2700+; ASUS A7N8X mobo; 512MB PC3200 ram; GF4 Ti4600; Maxtor 80GB; SB Live; Cambridge 2.1; NEC FE991SB; Liteon DVD-ROM
Comment
-
Macintosh!?!
My biggest gripe with XP is the fact that the standard interface seems to emulate the mac in many ways...
You search like crazy and dont find it untill third times around...
After spending a halfanhour disabling stuff, tou are still being treated like your not old enough to know what you doing...
"Do you realy want do delete this folder?"
"Are you shure?"
"This might compromise the stability"
(These are roughly translated from swedish and might not be identical to the actual english messages...)
And I still think WPA is just there to make my life harder....
It did not make the pirates life any harder at al.....If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."
Comment
Comment