Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

nVidia "Test"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Wombat
    Except that almost everybody implements the nVidia reference design. And who's to say it isn't a chip issue, rather than a board design issue?
    I'm under the assumption that if the situation is as bad as Gurm described:
    nVidia is on the verge of having a full-blown scandal on their hands
    Then at LEAST one board manufacturer would notice that there is such a severe problem with the chipset. Something of this magnitude would not slip through a dozen manufacturers' validating processes.

    Comment


    • #17
      I doubt that they do very much validation. Just slap together what nVidia suggested, make sure it runs on the reference system, and ship it. Why do you think there are so many nVidia manufacturers? Because the R&D is next to nothing the way they do it.
      Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

      Comment


      • #18
        a reviewer had similar problems with an MSI G4Ti4400


        saw this at [H]ardOCP

        ---e
        Iwill KK266-R
        Athlon Tbird 1GHz AYHJAR oc'd to 1.5 GHz
        128 megs Corsair PC133
        Windows 98 SE
        Matrox G400 MAX DH 32mb
        -----------------------------------

        Comment

        Working...
        X