Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Difference in games with new 6.50 and 5.51 drivers?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Difference in games with new 6.50 and 5.51 drivers?

    ppl are talking about the new DualHead features of the drivers. I couldn't care less aout DH since I have a single head card.

    So whats diffent in games? Any speed diff? Any problems fixed/created?
    P3 650@897 | Matrox G400 32mb SH @ 175/233 | 128mb PC133 | SB Live | winME

  • #2
    i'm not sure, i'll run Q3bench and get a bunch of results and compare them to the ones i got when i used 6.23.
    i'll show all my specs when i post the new ones. BRB

    ------------------
    Slow people as easy to pass, it's people who drive fast that are hard.
    no harm, no foul.

    Comment


    • #3
      well from what i can see, there is no difference between the scores, but i'll post them anyway.

      normal high MAX
      640x480 78.2 75.6 73.4
      800x600 71.5 60.6 59.4
      1024x768 50.5 39.0 38.4

      this is with PD driver 6.23

      normal high MAX
      640x480 78.3 75.9 73.5
      800x600 71.9 60.5 59.4
      1024x768 50.3 38.8 38.1

      these were done with the new 6.50 drivers

      the program i used was Quake3bench and whatever MAX settings are i don't know, but they don't seem to be any more taxing then high settings.

      system specs are:
      celeron 566@850
      Abit ZM6
      128meg Infineon RAM cas2 @100
      G400 32meg @160/200
      3dmark (with 6.26 drivers) 3293

      ------------------
      Slow people as easy to pass, it's people who drive fast that are hard.

      [This message has been edited by drzaius (edited 27 February 2001).]
      no harm, no foul.

      Comment


      • #4
        and to actually answer your question, or which is better 6.50 or 5.52 (well even that wasn't your exact question)

        normal high max
        640x480 78.6 76.2 73.4
        800x600 72.0 60.8 59.7
        1024x768 50.6 39.1 38.4

        done with PD 5.52 drivers
        and i'll just tell anyone reading this that, these aren't the most accuate of benchmarks, because i only ran them once.

        ------------------
        Slow people as easy to pass, it's people who drive fast that are hard.
        no harm, no foul.

        Comment


        • #5
          Looks like no reason to upgrade from my PD6.21.

          Not gonna bother upgrading until there's a solid 2-3FPS increase in something, or fixes bugs.
          P3 650@897 | Matrox G400 32mb SH @ 175/233 | 128mb PC133 | SB Live | winME

          Comment


          • #6
            Every driver release contains bug fixes and optimizations.

            Just because you don't see a FPS increase in Q3 doesn't mean that other applications won't benefit, you know ?

            Despite my nickname causing confusion, I am not female ...

            ASRock Fatal1ty X79 Professional
            Intel Core i7-3930K@4.3GHz
            be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 2
            4x 8GB G.Skill TridentX PC3-19200U@CR1
            2x MSI N670GTX PE OC (SLI)
            OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
            4x2TB Seagate Barracuda Green 5900.3 (2x4TB RAID0)
            Super Flower Golden Green Modular 800W
            Nanoxia Deep Silence 1
            LG BH10LS38
            LG DM2752D 27" 3D

            Comment


            • #7
              that is very true Maggi, remember that the oni demo owuld not work properly unless you got the 6.21 drivers.

              and has the "Alice" demo/game been fixed in these newer drivers? or do we still have to do that little trick to get that to work?

              ------------------
              Slow people as easy to pass, it's people who drive fast that are hard.
              no harm, no foul.

              Comment


              • #8
                it's been fixed

                Comment

                Working...
                X