Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pic: full sized Orion mockup

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    No explosions that were unintended. There was one where they intentionally put it into a failure mode (KIWI-B TNT: Jan, 1965) to confirm design predictions and a few occaisions where core fragments were expelled but none of these were runaway nuclear events. As noted the core expulsion issue was fixed. By 1967 the NRX-A6 engine was capable of running 60 minutes at a power level of 1,100+ megawatts, exceeding the NERVA design specs.

    As to size; early ones were too big to launch but later designs were launchable from the weight aspect. Ex: NERVA 2 weighed 11,860 kg., less than half the capacity of the shuttle and far below that of todays large boosters. As you can see below it looks a lot like Pratt & Whitney's Triton. The spheres at the top are the fuel tanks;

    Last edited by Dr Mordrid; 31 August 2006, 09:15.
    Dr. Mordrid
    ----------------------------
    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

    Comment


    • #17
      srry doc - I was referring to the old orion project - this would have had a mass of 3000 tons minimum to work....... Hence the numbers of rocket flights - sorry if there was some con"fusion"

      The original plan for the 'old' orion was to be launched from Earth - untill they realised how many ppl would die from fallout and the mag pulse..... (it would have required at least 8-10 small nukes in the tail to escape earth atmosphere - (note NOT escape velocity!))

      not the new one :-
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project..._propulsion%29
      Last edited by RedRed; 31 August 2006, 13:04.
      Dont just swallow the blue pill.

      Comment

      Working...
      X