Originally posted by MultimediaMan
View Post
- swipe & sign
- swipe only (maybe when the transaction is less than a certain amount?)
- chip & sign
- chip & pin
- chip only
- contactless & sign
In Europe, we don't do the swipe and/or sign thing, so back home I only have:
- chip & pin
- contactless only (no further interaction needed, and only works for a certain amount set by my bank, usually under 50 pound sterling)
One thing I noticed is that some US shops only accept swipe, even when their terminals are capable of chip/contactless. Apparently the fee that the merchant gets charged for swipe is lower than for chip and contactless ?
When I talk about contactless with american colleagues, they only seem to know it for use with smartphones. In Europe, most bank and credit cards have it nowadays (and mine seem to get accepted by US terminals that accept contactless just fine).
Finally, I noticed something weird when tipping for a restaurant meal in the US when using chip to pay. I authorized the transaction for the amount on the receipt (amount without tip, it just asks to confirm with 'yes'). I then received a bill where I could sign and add a tip (which I did).
A couple of days later, when I looked at the transaction history for the card, it showed the transaction for the original amount without tip, another transaction where the amount is reimburst, followed by a transaction for the amount including tip. Surely three transactions are a lot more costly than doing it in one go?
In Europe, when a restaurant accepts tips, there's an additional dialog on the payment terminal that asks the customer to enter an amount to tip, before they authorize the transaction.
I was wondering if it is the unfamiliarity with the chip & pin that causes this restaurant to perform three transactions to get the proper amount from my card?


Leave a comment: