Oh man, I feel like The Pit, Chief Lemon Buyer....
So I have this Dell WD19 USB-C docking station that should, through USB-PD 3.0, deliver 90W to non-Dell devices. I also just got the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro (16APH8) that has two USB-C ports that support USB-PD 3.0 and a charger was delivered with it rated at 100W.
In short: the laptop refuses to be charged by the hub. At boot it will say "The connected AC adapter has a lower wattage than the recommended AC which was shipped with the system. to use AC power, please connect the AC adapter which was shipped with the system."
So much for USB-PD 3.0 being easy and universal. The thing is, the hub says it supplies 19.5V / 6.7A which is kinda weird as USB-PD requires 20V (or 15/9/5). But under USB-PD 3.0, there is NO WAY 90W can be delivered at anything less than 20V. So my *guess* is, even if the hub delivers 19.5V, it will signal to the chargee that it can deliver 20V (and I assume tolerances will easily deal with the 0.5V).
Also, AFAIK, the USB-PD on the lappy should accept 20V/4.5 or at least 20V/3A as well. I realise it is not optimal but there is a handshake mechanism to reconcile capabilities in USB-PD.
Of course, specs are spare and unclear and support is refusing to really engage. Bunch a ****ers.
Oh, and EVEN Lenovo does not sell a USB-C hub that will charge this laptop as well. Why have USB-PD 3.0 on the laptop if you're making it so that only a simple adapter will work with it??
Also, why do manufacturers expose so little to end users? I would love to learn what the hub and the lappy exchange during handshake. I mean, all I can say right now is that it does not work but I have no clue, or way to find out, what specifically the lappy is complaining about. They might as well have said "Syntax Error 22". But computer says nah.
So I have this Dell WD19 USB-C docking station that should, through USB-PD 3.0, deliver 90W to non-Dell devices. I also just got the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro (16APH8) that has two USB-C ports that support USB-PD 3.0 and a charger was delivered with it rated at 100W.
In short: the laptop refuses to be charged by the hub. At boot it will say "The connected AC adapter has a lower wattage than the recommended AC which was shipped with the system. to use AC power, please connect the AC adapter which was shipped with the system."
So much for USB-PD 3.0 being easy and universal. The thing is, the hub says it supplies 19.5V / 6.7A which is kinda weird as USB-PD requires 20V (or 15/9/5). But under USB-PD 3.0, there is NO WAY 90W can be delivered at anything less than 20V. So my *guess* is, even if the hub delivers 19.5V, it will signal to the chargee that it can deliver 20V (and I assume tolerances will easily deal with the 0.5V).
Also, AFAIK, the USB-PD on the lappy should accept 20V/4.5 or at least 20V/3A as well. I realise it is not optimal but there is a handshake mechanism to reconcile capabilities in USB-PD.
Of course, specs are spare and unclear and support is refusing to really engage. Bunch a ****ers.
Oh, and EVEN Lenovo does not sell a USB-C hub that will charge this laptop as well. Why have USB-PD 3.0 on the laptop if you're making it so that only a simple adapter will work with it??
Also, why do manufacturers expose so little to end users? I would love to learn what the hub and the lappy exchange during handshake. I mean, all I can say right now is that it does not work but I have no clue, or way to find out, what specifically the lappy is complaining about. They might as well have said "Syntax Error 22". But computer says nah.
Comment