Tweet
Interesting article at ReactorCritical on Win2K / video comparison
Hehe. Check this out. Looks like Matrox has really done a decent job so far on their drivers in this OS:
http://www.reactorcritical.com/perfo...ce-win2k.shtml
I think the site's results for the game benchmarks are atypical though. I have to admit that games seem slower to me than under Win98, but not so slow as their results seem to indicate (same driver rev., of course). In fact, I currently play UT with my clan in Win2K now, at 800x600x32bit color. I just disable detail textures, trilinear filtering, and volumetric lighting. I leave everything else set to the maximum.
Still this is a very interesting article (looks like the DiME support in particular was well-written).
------------------
Ace
[This message has been edited by Ace (edited 23 February 2000).]
http://www.reactorcritical.com/perfo...ce-win2k.shtml
I think the site's results for the game benchmarks are atypical though. I have to admit that games seem slower to me than under Win98, but not so slow as their results seem to indicate (same driver rev., of course). In fact, I currently play UT with my clan in Win2K now, at 800x600x32bit color. I just disable detail textures, trilinear filtering, and volumetric lighting. I leave everything else set to the maximum.
Still this is a very interesting article (looks like the DiME support in particular was well-written).
------------------
Ace
[This message has been edited by Ace (edited 23 February 2000).]