Well how many of you are expecting to see a bloodbath when it comes to the reviews of Parhelia tommorow? I got a feeling that its going to get ugly by what most sites base their reviews on...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Are we going to see a bloodbath tommorow?
Collapse
X
-
Sounds like AnandTech was going to do a better job of evaluating the IQ of the P. I'm hoping to hear more subjective impressions of using this card versus its competitors. I'd also like to see more evaluation of the Ps performance (speed as well as IQ) when pushing its full capabilities.<TABLE BGCOLOR=Red><TR><TD><Font-weight="+1"><font COLOR=Black>The world just changed, Sep. 11, 2001</font></Font-weight></TR></TD></TABLE>
Comment
-
Somewhat bad... it should take longer to take a proper in-depth look at the P. So the sites first out will be the most FPS-based.
gnepDM says: Crunch with Matrox Users@ClimatePrediction.net
Comment
-
why are there so many non beliefers in the murcewr world all you murcers out there keep heads high tommorow will be the day is will all come out and we will be number one again
danm the beer was good again to nightspecs p4 2.8@3.2Ghz Giga byte xnpbla bla 2x80GbHD Raid 0 creative audigy iiyama vision master 502 (21inch) a logitech mx700
video is ati 9700pro modded to 9800 speeds volt mod ect ect
Comment
-
im still denying on other forums that this card is crap so if tomarrow every other reviewer comes out with the same disappointing results im gonna look like a real dumbass. If THG review is similar to others i have to admit I really did expect better from this card, and getting 29 fps at 1600x1200 while the g4 gets 40 ain't right and this is where i thought the matrox card was gonna shine
Comment
Comment