Zzzzzoooommmm....
No explosives: GPS guided kinetic kill
And they plan a ground based version.
http://news.usni.org/2015/04/14/navs...n-jhsv-trenton
No explosives: GPS guided kinetic kill
And they plan a ground based version.
http://news.usni.org/2015/04/14/navs...n-jhsv-trenton
NAVSEA Details At Sea 2016 Railgun Test on JHSV Trenton
Next year Naval Sea Systems Command will conduct the first at sea test of its electromagnetic railgun, hurling a guided 44 pound projectile and hypersonic speeds off the coast of Florida, NAVSEA officials said on Tuesday.
The BAE Systems designed test weapon will be mounted on the newly delivered Joint High Speed Vessel USNS Trenton (JHSV-5) and taken to Eglin Air Force Bases maritime test range off the Florida panhandle late in the summer of 2016. The Navy originally planned to use the JHSV USNS Millinocket (JHSV- 3) for the test.
Its a naval surface fire support demonstration, the Navys first to engage an over the horizon target [with a railgun], Capt. Mike Ziv, NAVSEAs program manager directed energy and electronic warfare program office told attendees at the Navy Leagues Sea-Air-Space 2015 Exposition.
The test will validate the assumptions the Navy has made in the decades-old pursuit of the railgun not only as a long range weapon to support troops ashore but start testing new ideas of using the weapon as an anti-surface warfare (ASUW) weapon, a ballistic missile defense (BMD) tool and as a close in weapon system for cruise missile threats.
NAVSEA outlined the expanded mission set for the railgun beyond naval surface fire support in a request for information issued earlier this year.
Traditionally, the Navy has used missiles to intercept targets but the railgun promises similar results for less money.
Theres a tradition that every time an enemy throws a threat at us our counter to that threat is one order more of magnitude expensive than the threat costs. This is a technology where were engaging threats at similar probabilities of kill for a cost thats about two orders of magnitude less, Ziv said.
Looking that the missions sets the railgun will be able to achieve the ship or land based facility, it will be able to store a lot more rounds and consummate a lot more engagements than a traditional missile-type system.
NAVSEA is also working with the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) to create a modular railgun system for both at sea and on land.
>
>
Next year Naval Sea Systems Command will conduct the first at sea test of its electromagnetic railgun, hurling a guided 44 pound projectile and hypersonic speeds off the coast of Florida, NAVSEA officials said on Tuesday.
The BAE Systems designed test weapon will be mounted on the newly delivered Joint High Speed Vessel USNS Trenton (JHSV-5) and taken to Eglin Air Force Bases maritime test range off the Florida panhandle late in the summer of 2016. The Navy originally planned to use the JHSV USNS Millinocket (JHSV- 3) for the test.
Its a naval surface fire support demonstration, the Navys first to engage an over the horizon target [with a railgun], Capt. Mike Ziv, NAVSEAs program manager directed energy and electronic warfare program office told attendees at the Navy Leagues Sea-Air-Space 2015 Exposition.
The test will validate the assumptions the Navy has made in the decades-old pursuit of the railgun not only as a long range weapon to support troops ashore but start testing new ideas of using the weapon as an anti-surface warfare (ASUW) weapon, a ballistic missile defense (BMD) tool and as a close in weapon system for cruise missile threats.
NAVSEA outlined the expanded mission set for the railgun beyond naval surface fire support in a request for information issued earlier this year.
Traditionally, the Navy has used missiles to intercept targets but the railgun promises similar results for less money.
Theres a tradition that every time an enemy throws a threat at us our counter to that threat is one order more of magnitude expensive than the threat costs. This is a technology where were engaging threats at similar probabilities of kill for a cost thats about two orders of magnitude less, Ziv said.
Looking that the missions sets the railgun will be able to achieve the ship or land based facility, it will be able to store a lot more rounds and consummate a lot more engagements than a traditional missile-type system.
NAVSEA is also working with the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) to create a modular railgun system for both at sea and on land.
>
>