new benchmark proggy from Mad-Potato

[Hein]

CPU score: 3860
Memory score: 1621
HDD score: 904

[SteveC]

Why's my HDD score less than 500, yet others have their HDD over 7-800?

[Novdid]

Either this benchmark is highly optimized for SSE or they never implemented any 3dnow! optimizations. Look at Hein's CPU score, it's slightly better than my TB running much faster. From what I've seen Palomino based CPU's perform much better than Thunderbirds, confirming my theory.

[Kosh Naranek]

well .. the 512 Kb L2 cache on the Tualatin does help .. a lot !

[Novdid]

Not in this bench. This is a link from Anandtech, I know they aren't the best reviewers around but results don't lie.

http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1595&p=11

The old Willamette core stays up there with the new Northwood. Now look at the difference between TB 1,4 and the 1600+.

[Guru]

http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1595&p=3 Nothing new with the colour we started reciving them a few months ago already! And BTW since when did all celerons come with a heatspredder?

[Kosh Naranek]

Originally posted by Novdid
Not in this bench. This is a link from Anandtech, I know they aren't the best reviewers around but results don't lie.

http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1595&p=11

The old Willamette core stays up there with the new Northwood. Now look at the difference between TB 1,4 and the 1600+.

Ok ...

The Athlon XP and the Tualatin both have hardware prefecthing !!

I haven't read the PCMark2002 Help file but I assume the XP uses SSE and the Tbird 3DNow and the difference between SSE and 3DNow isn't that big ....

[CHHAS]

CPU 3200
Mem 2554
Disk 345 (!)

Athlon 1200, ECS K7S5A, 256 MB PC2100, Quantum LM+ 30 GB, WD1000JB

[CHHAS]

Forced PCMark to run off the WD by disabling the Quantum, disk bench shot up to 1068

[KeiFront]

CPU 3658
Mem 2732
Disk 857

And according to PC Mark 2002 i've got 1Gig of Ram hmm I really tought I had 512Mb of Ram. And I guess SiSoft Sandra is a more usefull as a benchmark.

[rubank]

Hah,
what an utterly useless benchmark, in the "great" 3DMark tradition. Giving numbers you can´t relate to anything real-life.

"Wow, I changed memory and my score went up 384 points!"...telling you what? Doh!

I´ll take Sandra anytime, this is just a waste of time and space.

I ran PC2002 four times, each time getting better scores. Worthless.


rubank

[KeiFront]

My point exactly, Sandra is a far better synthetic benchmark.

[TdB]

cpu: 4465
mem: 4032
disk: 2143

the disk score seems way off, and the benchmark crashes my computer when i press the "online result browser" button, this benchmark sucks!

specs:
2 ghz p4
512 mb pc800
intel d850mv mobo
5 year old seagate 4,3 GB harddisk

[Maggi]

bah, it doesn't seem to support dual CPU machines ...

CPU score: 4443
mem score: 2543
HDD score: 829

system:

Tiger MP
2x Athlon MP 1800+
4x512MB ECC PC2100
Promise Fasttrak IDE Raid controller

[bootmeup]

hey, Maggi .. what do you run to use all that ram ? prime95?