Ati Radeon 9700 vs Matrox Parhelia
Here is a comparison its basically a Athlon XP 1600+ same as my machine against a Ati Radeon 9700
look at the multitexturing and the 8 lights poly count interesting...
look at the multitexturing and the 8 lights poly count interesting...
-
-
are you sure thats a radeon9700?
I mean, it doesn´t look that fast.
I didn´t know benchmarks was released for that card.
BTW parhelias multitexture fillrate is faster than the radeon9700(in theory), the 8-light polycount on the radeon9700 is lower than i expected though.
could be cpu limited.
Last edited by TdB; 8 August 2002, 10:30.This sig is a shameless atempt to make my post look bigger. -
If that was a R9700, then it was with some kind of AA and anisotropic enabled for sure.
Hell, I'm getting this kind of scores with my oc'ed Radeon8500LE:
(Exactly 10.000 points, not one single more or less. Try to copy that...)Comment
-
I dunno - 89fps for Nature is way faster than any comercially available card atm...Originally posted by Indiana
If that was a R9700, then it was with some kind of AA and anisotropic enabled for sure.
Hell, I'm getting this kind of scores with my oc'ed Radeon8500LE:
(Exactly 10.000 points, not one single more or less. Try to copy that...)"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen Roberts
µße®LørÐ - A legend in his underwear
Member of For F*ck Sake UT clan
DriverHeaven administrator
PowerVR Network administratorComment
-
well the single-texturing score, is very high compared to its multi-texturing, which fits the specs: 8 pipes and 1 tmu per pipe.
but again high polycount/8 lights is a bit low.
it could be with aniso and fsaa, or it could be a fake, or perhaps the drivers is holding it back.
and 89 fps(or atleast very close) in nature IS possible with an overclocked gf4ti. http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=3990219Last edited by TdB; 8 August 2002, 14:58.This sig is a shameless atempt to make my post look bigger.Comment
-
perhaps this is better for comparing:
it is on an overclocked system, but it is in the official madonion hall of fame, so i don´t think its a fake, and it is with default settings.
it has many simillarities whith the bench unicron posted, so i quess the radeon9700 is just cpu limited.
parhelias high polycount w/8 lights is still better though.Last edited by TdB; 8 August 2002, 14:51.This sig is a shameless atempt to make my post look bigger.Comment
-
shouldn't the 9700's single texture and multi texture values be the same ?Hey! You're talking to me all wrong! It's the wrong tone! Do it again...and I'll stab you in the face with a soldering ironComment
-
in theory, yes.Originally posted by CaineTanathos
shouldn't the 9700's single texture and multi texture values be the same ?
I think they have made some optimizations for multitexturing, though.This sig is a shameless atempt to make my post look bigger.Comment
-
Here is a 3DMark2001se score from a Radeon 9700 Pro with all info intact. I must admit this is going to be quite an impressive video card indeed for us PC gamers.
Last edited by APEXNETHOR; 14 August 2002, 21:13.
Hardcore PC gamer with a sweet tooth for EXTREME eye candy!Comment
-
OK, now those numbers seem more appropriate. Still the system was a highly oc'ed P4, so the numbers on real hardware will be lower.Comment
)
Comment