Parhelia vs Radeon 9700

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fav
    mini MURCer
    • May 2002
    • 65

    #1

    Parhelia vs Radeon 9700

    Some AA benchmarks, including Parhelia in high resolution

    Very good at high resolutions!
  • TdB
    Super MURCer
    • Jan 2001
    • 1238

    #2
    why does the gf4t14600 fail with 1600*1200*32 with fsaa??
    This sig is a shameless atempt to make my post look bigger.

    Comment

    • Novdid
      Super MURCer
      • Nov 2000
      • 2609

      #3
      Mem requierments maybe(It does have 128MB though...hmmm)???

      Comment

      • Moosmutzel
        mini MURCer
        • Jun 2002
        • 4

        #4
        Here is something for you: http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4246160
        My good old G400
        Please don't laugh (I'm playing HL:Cs and JK2 this 3-year-old card - and it does it well)
        But I think it's time for removeing my Millennium.
        Hmm maybe the 256MB Parhelia?
        Into Cyberspace with Opera- and Matrox-Power-Solutions
        My Computers

        Comment

        • borat
          Super MURCer
          • Jul 2001
          • 1035

          #5
          thats actually a pretty good score considering no t & l and the age of the card i think.
          is a flower best picked in it's prime or greater withered away by time?
          Talk about a dream, try to make it real.

          Comment

          • Moosmutzel
            mini MURCer
            • Jun 2002
            • 4

            #6
            Thx,
            Rember that Texture Format and Z-Buffer Depth were set to 16bit. With the 3DMarks Defaultsettings (both at 32bit) I got something around 1800 3DMarks.

            Thats good for a 3-year-old Card, indeed
            Into Cyberspace with Opera- and Matrox-Power-Solutions
            My Computers

            Comment

            Working...