Comparisons against RT2x00?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AndrewDV
    MURCer
    • Jan 2001
    • 413

    #1

    Comparisons against RT2x00?

    Hello,

    Has anyone run any comparison of MPEG encoding against the RT2x00 series? I am interested in quality of devices as well as their ability to work with Ulead MSP6.5.

    Thank you
  • AndrewDV
    MURCer
    • Jan 2001
    • 413

    #2
    Just a FYI, this is one of the better comparisons:

    Comment

    • Elie
      MURC Writer
      • Aug 1999
      • 4420

      #3
      That review is horibly outdated, since then the RT2000 has received numorous upgrades and code changes that allowed for better Mpeg-2 IBP encoding.

      MVT 3.1 is an example of that.

      Comment

      • Dr Mordrid
        Moderator
        • Apr 2001
        • 26592

        #4
        Yes, but realtime encoding of MPEG at capture never does achieve what encoding MPEG from the timeline can. This is true even when using DV sources from the RT-2x000's timeline, due mostly to the RT-2x000's compositing engine.

        Dr. Mordrid
        Dr. Mordrid
        ----------------------------
        An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

        I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

        Comment

        • AndrewDV
          MURCer
          • Jan 2001
          • 413

          #5
          I've heard that a lot recently. What gets me is that when I see the finished product, it looks really good. If the resulting files get sent out through a hardware decoder (Dxr3, Hollywood+, etc), they look like they came from the original. That may just be my opinion.

          Just tinkering around right now, but I noticed that MSP6.5 can handle MPEG files quite a bit better than previously done.

          Comment

          Working...