How does Thunderbird compare with PIII in Panasonic MPEG encoding speed?
I'm considering a Tbird system and was wondering how it compares to PIII when encoding MPEG?
-
- Mark
Core 2 Duo E6400 o/c 3.2GHz - Asus P5B Deluxe - 2048MB Corsair Twinx 6400C4 - ATI AIW X1900 - Seagate 7200.10 SATA 320GB primary - Western Digital SE16 SATA 320GB secondary - Samsung SATA Lightscribe DVD/CDRW- Midiland 4100 Speakers - Presonus Firepod - Dell FP2001 20" LCD - Windows XP Home -
I have no idea, I have neither...
Ghydda
------------------
2+2=5 - but only for extremly large values of 2.As I always say: You can get more with a kind word and a 2-by-4 than you can with just a kind word.
My beloved Parhelia was twotiming with Dan Wood - now she's gone forever and all I got is this lousy T-shirt
|Stolen Rig|RetroGames Rig|Workstation Rig|Server Rig| -
I don't have a T'bird, but I tested a PIII 800EB vs a 'classic' Athlon 900 a while ago, and the Athlon was 2 seconds quicker when encoding a 2 minute 352x288 AVI to VideoCD MPEG-1.
So basically I doubt there is much difference in speed between a CuMine PIII and a T'Bird Athlon of equivalent speed.Comment
-
RoGue-
Thanks for the info.
Hulk- Mark
Core 2 Duo E6400 o/c 3.2GHz - Asus P5B Deluxe - 2048MB Corsair Twinx 6400C4 - ATI AIW X1900 - Seagate 7200.10 SATA 320GB primary - Western Digital SE16 SATA 320GB secondary - Samsung SATA Lightscribe DVD/CDRW- Midiland 4100 Speakers - Presonus Firepod - Dell FP2001 20" LCD - Windows XP HomeComment
-
I really don't know if it is relevant, but the T-bird is very much faster in mp3-encoding and CAD150.
<A HREF="http://www.aceshardware.com/Spades/read.php?article_id=5000163">www.aceshardware.com/Spades/read.php?article_id=5000163</A>Comment
Comment