Win98 and 512MB Ram

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GT98
    FanBoy
    • Aug 1999
    • 4408

    #1

    Win98 and 512MB Ram

    I remember hearing problems with Windows 98 and 512MB of Ram. I tried pulling up the article on MS's Support site and it doesn't want to work for me. What do I need to change if I run into this problem?

    Scott
    Why is it called tourist season, if we can't shoot at them?
  • Electric Amish
    MURCer
    • Aug 1999
    • 920

    #2
    I heard it was only a possible problem with >512mb.

    amish
    Despite my nickname causing confusion, I have no religious affiliations.

    Comment

    • Lucid
      MURCer
      • Sep 1999
      • 190

      #3
      Here ya go..



      www.Google.com rocks
      Last edited by Lucid; 1 November 2001, 10:17.
      There's no place like 127.0.0.1

      Comment

      • Kosh Naranek
        MURCer
        • Apr 2001
        • 495

        #4
        As Electric Amish said ... it's only if you have >512 MB
        Last edited by Kosh Naranek; 1 November 2001, 10:22.
        Fear, Makes Wise Men Foolish !
        incentivize transparent paradigms

        Comment

        • Maggi
          Super MURCer
          • Jan 2000
          • 5057

          #5
          I run 512MB using Win98 and it's really nice, especially since I dedicated 128MB of it to run as a RAM disk, taking all my temporary tasks like WinZIP, WinRAR etc.

          Despite my nickname causing confusion, I am not female ...

          ASRock Fatal1ty X79 Professional
          Intel Core i7-3930K@4.3GHz
          be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 2
          4x 8GB G.Skill TridentX PC3-19200U@CR1
          2x MSI N670GTX PE OC (SLI)
          OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
          4x2TB Seagate Barracuda Green 5900.3 (2x4TB RAID0)
          Super Flower Golden Green Modular 800W
          Nanoxia Deep Silence 1
          LG BH10LS38
          LG DM2752D 27" 3D

          Comment

          • MultimediaMan
            Super MURCer
            • Sep 1999
            • 1905

            #6
            512MB May or may not cause some problems...

            But, if you've got that much RAM, by all means use it! Go over and get Cacheman , and assign healthy Diskcache and Filecache settings (FYI I use 20% of my RAM for 384MB systems and 15% for 512MB. YMMV)

            Another cool thing you can do is assign IRQs a little extra RAM as well: you do this in the system.ini file...check here for details. Dunno if it REALLY works, but every machine I've used it on has seemed to run better with it than without. Again, YMMV.

            M^3
            Hey, Donny! We got us a German who wants to die for his country... Oblige him. - Lt. Aldo Raine

            Comment

            • KvHagedorn
              Super MURCer
              • Aug 1999
              • 10725

              #7
              I was worried about this as well, but now that I have upgraded, I've seen no problems at all. Perhaps using registered ECC DIMMs helps, or perhaps I would indeed see no problems until I went above 512MB..

              Comment

              • Jon P. Inghram
                Super MURCer
                • Oct 1999
                • 3878

                #8
                I'm running Win98 with 768 megs of RAM in a 440BX board without any problems. Cacheman's very handy BTW.

                Comment

                • TnT
                  Super MURCer
                  • Sep 1999
                  • 1644

                  #9
                  Hey that IRQ thing seems to have helped my ping a bit while playing Half-Life. I'm on a school T1 line and I usually ping around 100 to certain servers, but now I'm getting around 50.

                  My SB Live is also on that IRQ, I wonder if this will help the dropped frames while capturing video. Guess I'll find out later.
                  Gigabyte GA-K8N Ultra 9, Opteron 170 Denmark 2x2Ghz, 2 GB Corsair XMS, Gigabyte 6600, Gentoo Linux
                  Motion Computing M1400 -- Tablet PC, Ubuntu Linux

                  "if I said you had a beautiful body would you take your pants off and dance around a bit?" --Zapp Brannigan

                  Comment

                  • J1NG
                    Super MURCer
                    • Feb 2000
                    • 1388

                    #10
                    I wouldn't worry about it. It doesn't occur to EVERY single platform out there. I've already tried several systems on Windows 98SE with >512 RAM (Basically a LOT ) and have had no problems. But I have to say that I've ALWAYS used the Registered ECC RAM when doing this, that may help stop it like someone said above, I'm not sure. But as many people have said, it only occurs to certain systems with Win98.

                    J1NG

                    Comment

                    • Patrick
                      MURCer
                      • Jan 2000
                      • 985

                      #11
                      There's NO problem.

                      I have 1024 Mbs of (non-registered) RAM installed on my Asus CUBX board running Win98se with no problems. We covered all this in an earlier thread you might want to check out.



                      Having Cacheman installed probably helped me avoid any potential trouble.

                      Comment

                      Working...