Microsoft declared Windows 98, 95, 3.xx and MS-DOS 6.xx (ALL flavors) "obsolete".

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GinoCyber
    MURCer
    • Sep 1999
    • 317

    #31
    'Does your ISA midi interface have a name?'

    It's an old voyetra 24sm.

    'Is the rest of your soundcard working okay?'

    Yes becuase the midi interface I'm using is a separate unit. It has 2 in and 4 outs. I'm not using the crappy interface that comes with just 1 in and 1 out on the sound cards.

    'Does that soundcard sit in the same ISA slot, and if yes, what is it's name?'

    It's a Santa Cruz pci card.

    Ciao

    Comment

    • Wombat
      Super MURCer
      • Aug 2000
      • 9498

      #32
      Jorden, is your ADSL modem a USB? If so, then your problem is the manufacturers, not MS. NT/XP are more strict about memory access than 9x kernels, and the hacks USB modems used in 9x don't work in NT kernels. There <I>are</I> correct ways to write such drivers, and MS warned the mfrs long ago that they would need to watch for this on XP.
      Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

      Comment

      • Casey Jones
        MURCer
        • Oct 2000
        • 131

        #33
        JORDAN-

        The one thing worse than a thief is a thief who points fingers at others for thieving.

        Casey

        Comment

        • Liquid Snake
          Super MURCer
          • Aug 1999
          • 2216

          #34
          Rags, I wasn't whining that I couldn't get DOS games working in Win2K. I was merely stating what I found when I tried to run them. I DO have an old system to run DOS games - the Celeron 466 (with a Matrox Millennium ) I mentioned.

          Comment

          • cbman
            Super MURCer
            • Mar 2001
            • 1136

            #35
            Hmmm... Millenium Goodness.

            I have a 4MB Millenium II that I picked up from a trade in that came into the shop the other day.

            It only took about 3 minutes from when I recognized the card to when it replaced the 32MB ATI Rage 128 GL that was in my workstation on my workbench.

            All I can say is...

            My eyes and this poor monitor have never been happier or clearer since I set it up.
            AMD Phenom 9650, 8GB, 4x1TB, 2x22 DVD-RW, 2x9600GT, 23.6' ASUS, Vista Ultimate
            AMD X2 7750, 4GB, 1x1TB 2x500, 1x22 DVD-RW, 1x8500GT, 22" Acer, OS X 10.5.8
            Acer 6930G, T6400, 4GB, 500GB, 16", Vista Premium
            Lenovo Ideapad S10e, 2GB, 500GB, 10", OS X 10.5.8

            Comment

            • Alec
              MURCer
              • Oct 1999
              • 960

              #36
              Are the 2D image quality and speed better than those of the G400?

              Comment

              • cbman
                Super MURCer
                • Mar 2001
                • 1136

                #37
                I would answer that but the G400 and G450 and G550 Cards have never been seen by my eyes. (In Person) so I don't have a comparison..

                I would have to say that the Millenium II is better than my G200 I used to have... and I thought the G200 was the bees knees
                AMD Phenom 9650, 8GB, 4x1TB, 2x22 DVD-RW, 2x9600GT, 23.6' ASUS, Vista Ultimate
                AMD X2 7750, 4GB, 1x1TB 2x500, 1x22 DVD-RW, 1x8500GT, 22" Acer, OS X 10.5.8
                Acer 6930G, T6400, 4GB, 500GB, 16", Vista Premium
                Lenovo Ideapad S10e, 2GB, 500GB, 10", OS X 10.5.8

                Comment

                • Alec
                  MURCer
                  • Oct 1999
                  • 960

                  #38
                  I had a G200 before. I find the G400 slightly better than the G200, mostly in color vividness and saturation.

                  Comment

                  Working...