First AMD ClawHammer benchmark?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Dr Mordrid
    Moderator
    • Apr 2001
    • 26592
    #1

    First AMD ClawHammer benchmark?

    Judge for yourself. I can't read Czech so....

    http://www.zive.cz/H/PCtuning/AR.asp...=4&EXPS=&EXPA=

    If this is real then the ClawHammer is one fast sonofabitch.

    Dr. Mordrid
    Dr. Mordrid
    ----------------------------
    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps
    Tags: None
    • Wombat
      Super MURCer
      • Aug 2000
      • 9498
      #2
      Looks like crap reporting to me.

      1. Just today I saw different numbers than that for the same Power4 setup.

      2. I know for a <B>fact</B> that they can't possibly have some of the numbers that they show up there. A lot of them are quite wrong.

      SPEC numbers are generally closely-guarded secrets until the time is just right, and I see at least 4 processors up there that aren't released yet. If it's not here: www.spec..org, then it's questionable.
      Last edited by Wombat; 19 January 2002, 00:29.
      Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

        Comment

        • cbman
          Super MURCer
          • Mar 2001
          • 1136
          #3


          I think I am going to have to go with Wombat on this one.

          AMD Phenom 9650, 8GB, 4x1TB, 2x22 DVD-RW, 2x9600GT, 23.6' ASUS, Vista Ultimate
          AMD X2 7750, 4GB, 1x1TB 2x500, 1x22 DVD-RW, 1x8500GT, 22" Acer, OS X 10.5.8
          Acer 6930G, T6400, 4GB, 500GB, 16", Vista Premium
          Lenovo Ideapad S10e, 2GB, 500GB, 10", OS X 10.5.8

            Comment

            • Kosh Naranek
              MURCer
              • Apr 2001
              • 495
              #4
              Me too ....
              Fear, Makes Wise Men Foolish !
              incentivize transparent paradigms

                Comment

                Previous template Next
                Working...