64Mb ABIT Siluro GeForce 3 Ti-200 Pure

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mdhome
    MURCer
    • Apr 2000
    • 842

    #1

    64Mb ABIT Siluro GeForce 3 Ti-200 Pure

    Does anyone have any ideas about the quality of this card? Does it overclock well? Scan.uk are selling them for less than £140.

    Regards MD
    Interests include:
    Computing, Reading, Pubs, Restuarants, Pubs, Curries, More Pubs and more Curries
  • Kosh Naranek
    MURCer
    • Apr 2001
    • 495

    #2
    From what I know ... 99.9 % of TI200 cards can reach TI500 specs. !
    Fear, Makes Wise Men Foolish !
    incentivize transparent paradigms

    Comment

    • mdhome
      MURCer
      • Apr 2000
      • 842

      #3
      I'm toying with the idea of buying one of these as opposed to a GF4 4200.

      Regards MD

      ... of course if Matrox make an announcement then I may wait
      Interests include:
      Computing, Reading, Pubs, Restuarants, Pubs, Curries, More Pubs and more Curries

      Comment

      • Belwarrior
        MURCer
        • Nov 2000
        • 888

        #4
        Hmm.. i read that GF4MX is not really the card to wait for as a ID software programmer (DOOM) remarked.. seems it is just a higher clocked GF2MX.. Is GF4 4200 = GF4MX
        Life is a bed of roses. Everyone else sees the roses, you are the one being gored by the thorns.

        AMD PhenomII555@B55(Quadcore-3.2GHz) Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 Kingston 1x2GB Generic 8400GS512MB WD1.5TB LGMulti-Drive Dell2407WFP
        ***Matrox G400DH 32MB still chugging along happily in my other pc***

        Comment

        • Wombat
          Super MURCer
          • Aug 2000
          • 9498

          #5
          Hmm, an Abit product. I'd avoid it.

          I got my Gainward "golden sample" Ti200 for $156. Nice 2D quality, and got the clock speeds at 250/550 with no problems.
          Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

          Comment

          • mdhome
            MURCer
            • Apr 2000
            • 842

            #6
            Originally posted by Belwarrior
            Hmm.. i read that GF4MX is not really the card to wait for as a ID software programmer (DOOM) remarked.. seems it is just a higher clocked GF2MX.. Is GF4 4200 = GF4MX
            Hello BelWarrior
            No, the Ti4200 is a genuine GF4 except that its clocked slightly slower. Unfortunately they may delay releasing it for fear of product encroachment. As for the GF4MX, for £100 I have been led to believe that you get almost GF2 ultra speeds.


            regards MD
            Interests include:
            Computing, Reading, Pubs, Restuarants, Pubs, Curries, More Pubs and more Curries

            Comment

            • Wombat
              Super MURCer
              • Aug 2000
              • 9498

              #7
              The GF4MX is pretty much another GF2, with GF2 visual quality.
              Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

              Comment

              • Belwarrior
                MURCer
                • Nov 2000
                • 888

                #8
                Thanks MD,
                Since my g400 is enuff for the games i play, i'll wait for the next card from matrox.. hope it does not take forever
                Life is a bed of roses. Everyone else sees the roses, you are the one being gored by the thorns.

                AMD PhenomII555@B55(Quadcore-3.2GHz) Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 Kingston 1x2GB Generic 8400GS512MB WD1.5TB LGMulti-Drive Dell2407WFP
                ***Matrox G400DH 32MB still chugging along happily in my other pc***

                Comment

                Working...