R300 & RV250 Pics over at PCPOP

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tempest
    Super MURCer
    • Mar 2001
    • 1111

    #16
    By those comments you guys think that Matrox builds their cards to provide and much cooling as possible when OCing?
    No, apparently not.

    But I wouldn't mind if they did

    Comment

    • GT98
      FanBoy
      • Aug 1999
      • 4408

      #17
      Originally posted by Greebe
      By those comments you guys think that Matrox builds their cards to provide and much cooling as possible when OCing?
      Nope but a nice bump in the core speed would help
      Why is it called tourist season, if we can't shoot at them?

      Comment

      • [GDI]Raptor
        Super MURCer
        • Jan 2001
        • 1045

        #18
        Look at the card, yuo need extra power input like in the Voodoo5!!!!

        If rumors are true, and ATI have a 0.15micron process, 105mil transistors on the chip, they will have a BIG problem with the clock speed! I don't think R300 will be as fast as many fanATIcs are hoping....

        We have to wait untill next round when 0.13micron processes are more availible! And don't cound Matrox out!

        Comment

        • Reckless
          MURCer
          • Feb 2001
          • 160

          #19
          Originally posted by [GDI]Raptor
          Look at the card, yuo need extra power input like in the Voodoo5!!!!

          If rumors are true, and ATI have a 0.15micron process, 105mil transistors on the chip, they will have a BIG problem with the clock speed! I don't think R300 will be as fast as many fanATIcs are hoping....
          1) WHO cares about needing another power connector? AGP Pro would have solved the power problem in the neatest forum but the spec seemed to have died as no card manufacturers used it.

          2) Ha bloody ha - do u think the clockspeed of the Matrox card is anywhere near as fast as everyone thought it would be? You also stress the fanatic wrt ATI - jesus look at the evangelism here for Matrox - almost makes me want to barf. I've used Matrox cards for years and years and the Parhelia is no longer on the shopping list. A shame but so what, IMO it's too expensive for what it does. I'm not whining/moaning/demanding better drivers/0.13 micron bah blah blah - just I'll buy something else and be done with it. My G400 Max is end of life (has been for a while) so I'd like something now - not whenever Matrox plays catch up again.
          Cheers, Reckless

          Comment

          • Wombat
            Super MURCer
            • Aug 2000
            • 9498

            #20
            1) I do. Part of this issue is pretty elementary: Power that goes in has to come out. If the card can't live on the 10-15W or so many video cards currently subsist on, cooling moves way up on the list of potential issues. There are AGP Pro motherboards, but so far I've only seen professional CAD cards need them.
            Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

            Comment

            • Technoid
              Super MURCer
              • Sep 1999
              • 7645

              #21
              IMHO: I don't think theres any reason to dislike a card that uses an pnboard power input.
              Less force on the mobo and probably more stable...
              If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.

              Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."

              Comment

              • rugger
                MURCer
                • Jul 2000
                • 914

                #22
                Sigh,

                These are PRE-production boards. They may/may-not represent what the final hardware will do.

                Remember that
                80% of people think I should be in a Mental Institute

                Comment

                • Jazzz
                  MURCer
                  • Apr 2002
                  • 175

                  #23
                  I hear it is a 10 layer board so that might allow higher speeds than the Parhelia, im still not sure whether the board has 107 mill transistors @ .15 and can run at high clock speeds, the 0.13 probably can but im not sure about .15. But then again i hope ATI do prove me wrong so it will put the pressure on nvidia to get the nv30 out quicker I wonder what the 2d quality is gonna be like on this board the R8500 was good so id suspect it will be better, maybe even upto matrox standards
                  Last edited by Jazzz; 7 July 2002, 16:03.

                  Comment

                  • Indiana
                    Super MURCer
                    • Mar 2000
                    • 2410

                    #24
                    Let's say the R8500 was sufficient, not more. The old Radeon was good and the G400 is excellent.

                    So in fact you'll have to hope that ATI didn't continue the trend they had started with the R8500 which had worse signal quality than the RadeonVIVO.
                    But we named the *dog* Indiana...
                    My System
                    2nd System (not for Windows lovers )
                    German ATI-forum

                    Comment

                    Working...