Radeon 9700 Benchmarks...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 103er-Fan
    MURCer
    • Jun 2002
    • 320

    #16
    One against all!

    There is a new german Radeon 9700 Pro review out! Chip.de is testing the new ATI chip against a GF4 Ti4600 and... yes right: Our beloved Parhelia!
    I am just reading it, so I won't comment it yet.

    chip.de Radeon 9700 review

    Edit: They also have a Anti-Aliasing picture gallery there, which compares the quality of each card. Unfortunatly the pictures are very small and they are really dark, you can't tell which card is better there.
    Last edited by 103er-Fan; 18 August 2002, 13:14.
    Specs:
    MSI 745 Ultra :: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ :: 1024 MB PC-266 DDR-RAM :: HIS Radeon 9700 (Catalyst 3.1) :: Creative Soundblaster Live! 1024 :: Pioneer DVD-106S :: Western Digital WD800BB :: IBM IC35L040AVVN07

    Comment

    • borat
      Super MURCer
      • Jul 2001
      • 1035

      #17
      hmm interestingly parhelia convincingly beats a 4600 at high res and detail in these tests yet very few of the initial reviews of p included such tests!and that was without the latest performance enhancing drivers too!
      is a flower best picked in it's prime or greater withered away by time?
      Talk about a dream, try to make it real.

      Comment

      • Indiana
        Super MURCer
        • Mar 2000
        • 2410

        #18
        103er-Fan: Erm, this is exactly the same review isochar posted above in this thread. See also above why it's flawed.

        Borat: He even gives the GF4 a strong unfair advantage as he uses quincunx, which is fast but does look like crap. If he'd use real AA on the GF4 (not to speak from even real 6x AA as he uses on the R9700), it would look even worse.
        Last edited by Indiana; 18 August 2002, 17:33.
        But we named the *dog* Indiana...
        My System
        2nd System (not for Windows lovers )
        German ATI-forum

        Comment

        • MadScot
          MURCer
          • Aug 2000
          • 349

          #19
          Originally posted by Indiana
          P.S: @MadScot: ATI has officially presented the Radeon 9700PRO (the "PRO" is another marketing BS, probably meant for leaving space for lower clocked non-Pro versions) and it will have 325MHz GPU and 310MHz RAM clocks.
          Thanks Indiana! I musta been not paying attention that week, cause I don't remember anything about that...

          MadScot
          Asus P2B-LS, Celeron Tualatin 1.3Ghz (PowerLeap adapter), 256Mb PC100 CAS 2, Matrox Millenium G400 DualHead AGP, RainbowRunner G-series, Creative PC-DVD Dxr2, HP CD-RW 9200i, Quantum V 9Gb SCSI HD, Maxtor 20Gb Ultra-66 HD (52049U4), Soundblaster Audigy, ViewSonic PS790 19", Win2k (SP2)

          Comment

          • 103er-Fan
            MURCer
            • Jun 2002
            • 320

            #20
            Originally posted by Indiana
            103er-Fan: Erm, this is exactly the same review isochar posted above in this thread. See also above why it's flawed.
            Oh sorry, I overlooked this
            Specs:
            MSI 745 Ultra :: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ :: 1024 MB PC-266 DDR-RAM :: HIS Radeon 9700 (Catalyst 3.1) :: Creative Soundblaster Live! 1024 :: Pioneer DVD-106S :: Western Digital WD800BB :: IBM IC35L040AVVN07

            Comment

            • Jazzz
              MURCer
              • Apr 2002
              • 175

              #21
              Re: One against all!

              Originally posted by 103er-Fan
              There is a new german Radeon 9700 Pro review out! Chip.de is testing the new ATI chip against a GF4 Ti4600 and... yes right: Our beloved Parhelia!
              I am just reading it, so I won't comment it yet.

              chip.de Radeon 9700 review

              Edit: They also have a Anti-Aliasing picture gallery there, which compares the quality of each card. Unfortunatly the pictures are very small and they are really dark, you can't tell which card is better there.
              that has to be one of the worst reviews ever

              like Indiana said look at the AA and ansio benchies, look at the settings used:

              GF4: Quincunx + 8x Ansio
              Parhelia: 16xFAA + 2x Ansio
              R9700: 6xMSAA + 16x Ansio

              [sarcasm]wow this guy sure does know what he is doing[/sarcasm]

              i think we should wait till tomarrow and look at a "proper" review

              Comment

              • GT98
                FanBoy
                • Aug 1999
                • 4408

                #22
                Hey might not be able to understand much german, but the Banner ads with boobies speaks unverisly to everyone!
                Why is it called tourist season, if we can't shoot at them?

                Comment

                • Helevitia
                  Super MURCer
                  • Aug 1999
                  • 6628

                  #23
                  Here is a link to rage3d with some cool info from quakecon. It's not a review but it's the next best thing and if everything he says is true, than my purchase of this card is inevtiable

                  Radeon technical support forum for all Radeon products from the classic Radeon to the latest cutting edge family of graphics cards.


                  Dave
                  Ladies and gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and slide on the ice.

                  Comment

                  • jackzod
                    MURCer
                    • Oct 1999
                    • 204

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Dghost
                    kinda limited benchmarks, so it is a little early to tell, but it looks like without FSAA enabled it really doesn't smoke the competition.

                    suprise suprise
                    Surprise Surprise indeed...

                    Take a look at real bench now instead of some botched one, lets see if youre still that much unimpressed.
                    This is amazing

                    Athlon64 4800+
                    Asus A8N deluxe
                    2 gig munchkin ddr 500
                    eVGA 7800 gtx 512 in SLI
                    X-Fi Fatality
                    HP w2207

                    Comment

                    • thop
                      Super MURCer
                      • Mar 2001
                      • 2536

                      #25
                      wow. i know whats gonna be under my christmas tree this year do you?
                      am especially impressed with the UT2003 performance (the only game next to D3 i care about), it smokes the 4600. 300% @1600x1200 4xAA 16XANI. 500% with the same settings in JK2.

                      hmm the card seem to be still very cpu limited, even at 1600x1200.

                      JK2 AA ON AF ON @1600x1200:
                      1,5Ghz AMD: 25 FPS
                      2,5Ghz AMD: 92 FPS!
                      Last edited by thop; 19 August 2002, 07:17.
                      no matrox, no matroxusers.

                      Comment

                      • isochar
                        Super MURCer
                        • Nov 1999
                        • 1113

                        #26
                        This is what the Parhelia should've done.

                        Comment

                        • CHHAS
                          Super MURCer
                          • Jan 2000
                          • 1223

                          #27
                          Funny you should mention it, that was the performance the hype surrounding P. led me to expect too.
                          "That's right fool! Now I'm a flying talking donkey!"

                          P4 2.66, 512 mb PC2700, ATI Radeon 9000, Seagate Barracude IV 80 gb, Acer Al 732 17" TFT

                          Comment

                          • Novdid
                            Super MURCer
                            • Nov 2000
                            • 2609

                            #28
                            Me too, sadly.

                            Comment

                            • 103er-Fan
                              MURCer
                              • Jun 2002
                              • 320

                              #29
                              Very impressive
                              Now I have to admit that I am actually a bit annoyed that I bought the Parhelia instead of waiting for Radeon 9700 benchies, especially as a fan of Anti-Aliasing and Aniso Filtering
                              But I will see how UT 2003 plays on my P. when it's out
                              Specs:
                              MSI 745 Ultra :: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ :: 1024 MB PC-266 DDR-RAM :: HIS Radeon 9700 (Catalyst 3.1) :: Creative Soundblaster Live! 1024 :: Pioneer DVD-106S :: Western Digital WD800BB :: IBM IC35L040AVVN07

                              Comment

                              • Indiana
                                Super MURCer
                                • Mar 2000
                                • 2410

                                #30
                                No real reason to be annoyed, You bought what you thought to be the best option at the time you made your decision.
                                Maybe the ATI 9700 buyers will get the same feeling when the NV30 is released next year. That's just how things are in computer-business. Any card that's really available is already starting to get old...
                                But we named the *dog* Indiana...
                                My System
                                2nd System (not for Windows lovers )
                                German ATI-forum

                                Comment

                                Working...