What's the slowest Radeon 64MB DDR?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pace
    Super MURCer
    • Feb 2000
    • 3414

    #1

    What's the slowest Radeon 64MB DDR?

    Someone's been asking me about a system quote they had.

    It's an AMD 2000MHz processor to begin with - is there even a 2000MHz chip? I'm making a fair guess it's a 2000+, but wondering if it's a possibility. They also list 512MB RAM, any chance this could be SDR?

    And finally, the main issue...(well, not really, but I just thought of the Radeon), they have a Radeon 64MB DDR. What could this be, and how does it fare speedwise?

    Thanks,

    P.
    Meet Jasmine.
    flickr.com/photos/pace3000
  • Taz
    Super MURCer
    • Nov 1999
    • 1393

    #2
    Re: What's the slowest Radeon 64MB DDR?

    Originally posted by Pace
    It's an AMD 2000MHz processor to begin with - is there even a 2000MHz chip?
    The XP2400+ runs at 2Ghz
    When you own your own business you only have to work half a day. You can do anything you want with the other twelve hours.

    Comment

    • thop
      Super MURCer
      • Mar 2001
      • 2536

      #3
      Radeon DDR ... slower than a 7500 (which is a Radeon on steroids).
      no matrox, no matroxusers.

      Comment

      • Indiana
        Super MURCer
        • Mar 2000
        • 2410

        #4
        If it's an ATI retail Radeon64MB DDR, it runs at 183/183MHz (synchronous core/Ram operation), at least my Radeon64MB DDR VIVO did (a very fine card, btw with crisp 2D).
        The OEM versions of the RadeonDDR were supposed to run at 166/166MHz, but you NEVER can be sure if there was not one crappy el-cheapo manufacturer (PowerColor, anyone?) using some much lower setting with ATI chips that failed the tests to be used on ATIs own cards. So you have to use e.g. PowerStrip to read it out and/or specifically ask for the clockspeeds.
        But we named the *dog* Indiana...
        My System
        2nd System (not for Windows lovers )
        German ATI-forum

        Comment

        • Pace
          Super MURCer
          • Feb 2000
          • 3414

          #5
          Ok, thanks Taz, off to check pricing on that

          So, it's an original Radeon? I thought they stopped at 32MB, ah well

          And finally, can a 2000+/2400+ be run with SDR RAM?

          Thanks guys,

          P.
          Meet Jasmine.
          flickr.com/photos/pace3000

          Comment

          • thop
            Super MURCer
            • Mar 2001
            • 2536

            #6
            sdram, sure.
            no matrox, no matroxusers.

            Comment

            • Pace
              Super MURCer
              • Feb 2000
              • 3414

              #7
              Ok. It's listed as an Asus motherboard, so I guess they've got a stock of old boards and SDRAM to get rid of.

              Thanks again.
              Meet Jasmine.
              flickr.com/photos/pace3000

              Comment

              • borat
                Super MURCer
                • Jul 2001
                • 1035

                #8
                a moment of silence for the radeon vivo 64meg please, the finest card ati ever produced.
                is a flower best picked in it's prime or greater withered away by time?
                Talk about a dream, try to make it real.

                Comment

                • Novdid
                  Super MURCer
                  • Nov 2000
                  • 2609

                  #9
                  No, you're forgetting the 9700 Pro.

                  Comment

                  • borat
                    Super MURCer
                    • Jul 2001
                    • 1035

                    #10
                    nah its got no soul the radeon was the ONLY card produced by ati with that quality, matrox millenium millenium 2, and g400max share it, as do the canupus 6 meg voodoos, and some number nine cards too, not to mention the colosus voodoo 5 6000.
                    is a flower best picked in it's prime or greater withered away by time?
                    Talk about a dream, try to make it real.

                    Comment

                    • K6-III
                      Super MURCer
                      • Dec 2000
                      • 2253

                      #11
                      You're forgetting about the RadeonLE with HyperZ disabled.....
                      Let us return to the moon, to stay!!!

                      Comment

                      • Indiana
                        Super MURCer
                        • Mar 2000
                        • 2410

                        #12
                        The Radeon 64MB VIVO really was a sweet card. Majorly been the reason to keep me with ATI until now and only a very slight step back in 2D against my G400.
                        But then the R9700Pro sure is an impressive card as well. If I had to rate, I'd rate the 8500 a bit lower because of some problems with TVOut quality and only medicore 2D.

                        EDIT: K6-III: ROFL
                        But we named the *dog* Indiana...
                        My System
                        2nd System (not for Windows lovers )
                        German ATI-forum

                        Comment

                        Working...