New all-in-one DivX/XviD encoder

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Topha
    Super MURCer
    • Jan 2001
    • 1235

    #1

    New all-in-one DivX/XviD encoder

    Still very beta, but its working fine for me. Quite easy to use. And its open source, too

    DVX

    edit: added the link, oops, forget my own head next
    Last edited by Topha; 2 March 2003, 10:34.
  • K6-III
    Super MURCer
    • Dec 2000
    • 2253

    #2
    Which one???

    Your post left things very vague...
    Let us return to the moon, to stay!!!

    Comment

    • Topha
      Super MURCer
      • Jan 2001
      • 1235

      #3
      one setback is that you need the .Net framework though, I guess a lot of people wont be happy with that

      Comment

      • Technoid
        Super MURCer
        • Sep 1999
        • 7645

        #4
        Originally posted by Topha
        one setback is that you need the .Net framework though, I guess a lot of people wont be happy with that
        It's not "one" setback, it's THE setback
        If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.

        Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."

        Comment

        • agallag
          Super MURCer
          • Aug 1999
          • 3201

          #5
          What do you have against the .Net framework?
          Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox

          Comment

          • Gurm
            MS Fanboy
            • Aug 1999
            • 11460

            #6
            Nothing. The .NET framework is a perfectly reasonable thing. It's fast, it's nice to work with... what's the problem? Anti-MS sentiment, that's what.

            - Gurm
            The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!

            I'm the least you could do
            If only life were as easy as you
            I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
            If only life were as easy as you
            I would still get screwed

            Comment

            • Chrono_Wanderer
              Super MURCer
              • Mar 2002
              • 2540

              #7
              for those who's running Win9x

              Comment

              • Jon P. Inghram
                Super MURCer
                • Oct 1999
                • 3878

                #8
                .net works on Win98 too.

                Comment

                • Topha
                  Super MURCer
                  • Jan 2001
                  • 1235

                  #9
                  Nothing wrong with it, I installed it. There is just a lot of people who dont seem to like it, so I posted a warning for them

                  Comment

                  • Technoid
                    Super MURCer
                    • Sep 1999
                    • 7645

                    #10
                    Originally posted by agallag
                    What do you have against the .Net framework?
                    You misunderstood me completely

                    I got nothing against .net in partikular....

                    the software 4mb
                    the syspack 5mb
                    .net 20MB!!!

                    The program seems to just be a fancy frontend utilising the .net framework to interconect with the warious standalone programs it needs to funtion.......


                    Originally posted by Gurm
                    Nothing. The .NET framework is a perfectly reasonable thing. It's fast, it's nice to work with... what's the problem? Anti-MS sentiment, that's what.

                    - Gurm
                    In this case I was not "anti-ms" but after reading up on .net I dont see any reason to use it unless you have a server and a client situation.....
                    Last edited by Technoid; 3 March 2003, 07:12.
                    If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.

                    Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."

                    Comment

                    • Indiana
                      Super MURCer
                      • Mar 2000
                      • 2410

                      #11
                      And I still can't really see which advantage this would give me over the reasonably small DVDx 2.0 I'm currently using (which is 5MB in total without any additional tools - OK, of course you need the DivX or any other AVI codec of your choice)
                      But we named the *dog* Indiana...
                      My System
                      2nd System (not for Windows lovers )
                      German ATI-forum

                      Comment

                      • KeiFront
                        Super MURCer
                        • Sep 2001
                        • 2668

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Gurm
                        Nothing. The .NET framework is a perfectly reasonable thing. It's fast, it's nice to work with... what's the problem? Anti-MS sentiment, that's what.
                        - Gurm
                        It's nice to work with, but it's certainly not fast and it consumes a lot of memory.
                        Main: Dual Xeon LV2.4Ghz@3.1Ghz | 3X21" | NVidia 6800 | 2Gb DDR | SCSI
                        Second: Dual PIII 1GHz | 21" Monitor | G200MMS + Quadro 2 Pro | 512MB ECC SDRAM | SCSI
                        Third: Apple G4 450Mhz | 21" Monitor | Radeon 8500 | 1,5Gb SDRAM | SCSI

                        Comment

                        • Topha
                          Super MURCer
                          • Jan 2001
                          • 1235

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Indiana
                          And I still can't really see which advantage this would give me over the reasonably small DVDx 2.0 I'm currently using (which is 5MB in total without any additional tools - OK, of course you need the DivX or any other AVI codec of your choice)
                          you can, for example, encode a movie and mux 2 different AC3/mp3 soundtracks at the same time, and it also gives you a compressibility check and a good file size prediction.

                          actually i like gknot (www.doom9.org) better, but they dont support divx 5.03 yet

                          Comment

                          • TnT
                            Super MURCer
                            • Sep 1999
                            • 1644

                            #14
                            Here's another one: AutoDub
                            Gigabyte GA-K8N Ultra 9, Opteron 170 Denmark 2x2Ghz, 2 GB Corsair XMS, Gigabyte 6600, Gentoo Linux
                            Motion Computing M1400 -- Tablet PC, Ubuntu Linux

                            "if I said you had a beautiful body would you take your pants off and dance around a bit?" --Zapp Brannigan

                            Comment

                            • Topha
                              Super MURCer
                              • Jan 2001
                              • 1235

                              #15
                              yep, saw that one too. There seem to be quite a lot of those toys in production. So far GKnot is still my favorite, since it is the most mature

                              Comment

                              Working...