-
-
LOL
Lawrence -
Hmm... is this hi tech or lo tech (or ghetto)?P4 Northwood 1.8GHz@2.7GHz 1.65V Albatron PX845PEV Pro
Running two Dell 2005FPW 20" Widescreen LCD
And of course, Matrox Parhelia | My Matrox histroy: Mill-I, Mill-II, Mystique, G400, ParheliaComment
-
Actually, If memory serves, I think the first proof-of-concept RAID array was a bunch of floppy drives.Hey, Donny! We got us a German who wants to die for his country... Oblige him. - Lt. Aldo RaineComment
-
yes, that sounds familiar. (proof of RAID)
I have also seen tape drive RAID....for backing up BIG data sets with no tape swapping.
and cd rom raid,....was used for some kind web server application.Comment
-
now that would be supurb for a ppt demonstration
.. flawless
"They say that dreams are real only as long as they last. Couldn't you say the same thing about life?"Comment
-
..................and I have also seen dorm-raids to have quicker access to free alcohol while I was a student....Originally posted by Marshmallowman
yes, that sounds familiar. (proof of RAID)
I have also seen tape drive RAID....for backing up BIG data sets with no tape swapping.
and cd rom raid,....was used for some kind web server application.
LawrenceComment
-
The page cannot be displayedAccording to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless..
.Comment
-
GURU - you too?LawrenceComment
-
Yes but now its working!Originally posted by LvR
GURU - you too?According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless...Comment
-
no problem accesing the page over here
Some people obviously has to much time :P
If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."Comment
-
Hehe, nice. I actually used to jest about FDD RAID years ago. I just don't understand why he got so much LOSS. I mean his array was less then the capacity of 3 of the disks, yet it was FIVE disks. WTF?Comment
-
Its most likely running on FAT8, and as we all know FAT16 was already inefficient - what else did you expect from a "transparent blue computer"...................
LawrenceComment
-
he may have been running raid 5 which has redundancy and is not simple striping.Comment
-
That's his point. Raid 5 costs you the capacity of one disk to store the parity information, but this guy's array was much smaller than it should've been, given the number of disks.Originally posted by Marshmallowman
he may have been running raid 5 which has redundancy and is not simple striping.
He has 5 disks, so his array should be
1.44MB X 5 - 1.44MB = 5.76MB
but his mounted drive was only 3.9MB. Where did the other 1.86 MB go?
Edit: even if you use formatted capacity, 1.38MB per disk, it's still missing a pile of space.Last edited by agallag; 8 April 2003, 21:10.Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry CoxComment
USB floppy disk striped raid under OS
Comment