maybe old news but HDTach 2.7 is out

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ayoub_ibrahim
    Super MURCer
    • Dec 1999
    • 2445

    #1

    maybe old news but HDTach 2.7 is out

  • DukeP
    Super MURCer
    • Nov 1999
    • 1830

    #2
    Thank You.

    ~~DukeP~~

    Comment

    • DukeP
      Super MURCer
      • Nov 1999
      • 1830

      #3
      My old IBM (80GB) gives the following scores:
      Read speed;
      Max 48.7MB/s
      Min 24.6MB/s
      Average 39.1MB/sec
      CPU usage: 7.0%

      How does this compare??

      ~~DukeP~~

      Comment

      • Admiral
        Super MURCer
        • Aug 2000
        • 3125

        #4
        Re: maybe old news but HDTach 2.7 is out

        It's news here, thanks

        Comment

        • The PIT
          Super MURCer
          • Aug 1999
          • 11901

          #5
          Thanks about time they added 2000 and XP support.
          Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
          Weather nut and sad git.

          My Weather Page

          Comment

          • Admiral
            Super MURCer
            • Aug 2000
            • 3125

            #6
            2.61 also had 2k/XP support, though I think only for the registered version.

            Comment

            • The PIT
              Super MURCer
              • Aug 1999
              • 11901

              #7
              Originally posted by Admiral
              2.61 also had 2k/XP support, though I think only for the registered version.
              Yep being a tight git I didn't want to register it.
              Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
              Weather nut and sad git.

              My Weather Page

              Comment

              • ayoub_ibrahim
                Super MURCer
                • Dec 1999
                • 2445

                #8
                noticed that it'll only read from my C partition & not from the others whereas with the 2.61 you could get it to read the full disk with all its partitions by checking a single box!

                Comment

                • DentyCracker
                  Super MURCer
                  • Jan 2000
                  • 2023

                  #9
                  Strange it said entire diskby default on my 100GB/14GB partitioned "120GB" HD
                  Attached Files
                  [size=1]D3/\/7YCR4CK3R
                  Ryzen: Asrock B450M Pro4, Ryzen 5 2600, 16GB G-Skill Ripjaws V Series DDR4 PC4-25600 RAM, 1TB Seagate SATA HD, 256GB myDigital PCIEx4 M.2 SSD, Samsung LI24T350FHNXZA 24" HDMI LED monitor, Klipsch Promedia 4.2 400, Win11
                  Home: M1 Mac Mini 8GB 256GB
                  Surgery: HP Stream 200-010 Mini Desktop,Intel Celeron 2957U Processor, 6 GB RAM, ADATA 128 GB SSD, Win 10 home ver 22H2
                  Frontdesk: Beelink T4 8GB

                  Comment

                  • Faramir1966
                    MURCer
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 158

                    #10
                    Seagate 80GB running at UDMA100
                    Attached Files
                    ASUS P5B-E ;2GB G.Skill DDR2 Ram; C2D6420;lub 3D X1950pro ;SoundBlaster X-Fi;WinXP

                    Comment

                    • SuRGV
                      MURCer
                      • Nov 2000
                      • 216

                      #11
                      This is mine. 2x80 GB Maxtor Diamond Plus 9 2MB on RAID 0. Is this good ?

                      MSI K8N Neo 2 Platinum
                      AMD Athlon 64 3200
                      1024 MB PC3200 RAM
                      WD 160 GB HDD
                      2 x 80 GB Maxtor HDDs in RAID 1
                      ATI 9500 64 Videocard
                      Pioneer 108 DVD-RW
                      Pioneer 117 DVD-ROM
                      Windows XP Professional SP2

                      Comment

                      • UtwigMU
                        Super MURCer
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 5651

                        #12
                        WD Special Edition WD1200JB 120GB/7200RPM/8MB
                        Attached Files

                        Comment

                        • Admiral
                          Super MURCer
                          • Aug 2000
                          • 3125

                          #13
                          WD Enterprise Edition 36GB/10k rpm/8MB
                          Attached Files

                          Comment

                          • Jon P. Inghram
                            Super MURCer
                            • Oct 1999
                            • 3878

                            #14
                            LMAO...

                            INCORRECT DRIVE SIZE DETECTED –
                            HD Tach may not determine the correct drive size on some Windows 95/98/ME systems. This issue will cause HD Tach to only benchmark the first 8gb of your drive. In this case, only the CPU utilization, burst speed and maximum read speed will be valid. Minimum and average read speed results will be incorrect.
                            Removed the Advanced size check feature. The advanced size check feature was added in an earlier version to attempt to detect hard drive sizes when HD Tach was not calculating it properly from the OS. This feature ended up not working as well as expected and caused confusion among users.
                            Gee, thanks!

                            Comment

                            • Chrono_Wanderer
                              Super MURCer
                              • Mar 2002
                              • 2540

                              #15
                              nice score admiral! (and great CPU usage!) Maybe I should get a WD next time...

                              my god. my drive sucks...

                              edit: Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 60 40.0GB ATA100 2MB 7200rpm
                              Attached Files
                              Last edited by Chrono_Wanderer; 19 October 2003, 21:26.

                              Comment

                              Working...