well, the way the NT memory manager works suggests that what ramboost does is a bad idea and would probably reduce performance.
-
80% of people think I should be in a Mental Institute
-
There's a difference between ram "boosters" and cache managers.
The ram boosters use compression, and I've found them useless for virtually everything. The cache managers just help manage your paging, and I find them very useful on Win9x boxes.Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.Comment
-
They make Win2k and WinXP run SLOWER, because they "do" (I don't think they DO anything, but hey) what the OS already does, and take up CPU cycles and RAM to do it.
- GurmThe Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!
I'm the least you could do
If only life were as easy as you
I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
If only life were as easy as you
I would still get screwedComment
Comment