Which Processor Would You Buy?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • agallag
    Super MURCer
    • Aug 1999
    • 3201

    #16
    If I could find a good stable motherboard, I'd go for an A64. I like the stability of those i865/875 boards though. How are the A64 boards looking these days anyway?

    My AthlonXP on Via chipset board was overall not a great purchase. Probably would've been much better if I went with a SIS or nForce, but alas, I didn't...
    Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox

    Comment

    • Helevitia
      Super MURCer
      • Aug 1999
      • 6628

      #17
      This is the longest I've held out upgrading. When I do it will be:

      Socket939
      AMD FX
      PCIE
      SATA HDD
      SATA Dual Layer DVDRW
      BTX(maybe)
      DDR2(if the prices come down)
      Hopefully SATA CDRWs are out
      Ladies and gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and slide on the ice.

      Comment

      • borat
        Super MURCer
        • Jul 2001
        • 1035

        #18
        right now, i would go for a mobile xp2500, i bought one but had to sell it as my motherboard could only acces low multipliers. The latest ones will OC to 2.5G without much effort, and cost less than $100, not bad for something that will easily give A64 a good run for its money. With that in mind i could'nt justify the exrta expense of currently useless 64bit instructions.
        is a flower best picked in it's prime or greater withered away by time?
        Talk about a dream, try to make it real.

        Comment

        • Chrono_Wanderer
          Super MURCer
          • Mar 2002
          • 2540

          #19
          Athlon 64 non-FX on PGA939 w/512K Cache.

          Having a 64bit desktop is a "cool" thing IMO, but most importantly hypertransport...

          Comment

          • bsdgeek
            Super MURCer
            • Feb 2002
            • 1543

            #20
            Err, well if I sell the all the junk I have (Parhelia, Tiger MPX that I never used, various socket A boards & video cards) I might be able to afford a nice Athlon 64/#9 S3 Trio64v+ setup.

            If I were to upgrade now, though I don't feel the need for it yet, I would go for Athlon XP/nForce2's low-cost yet still an upgrade over XP1800+/AMD760.

            Comment

            • Kurt
              Super MURCer
              • Feb 2000
              • 1839

              #21
              Right now I'd go for a cheap A64 3000+ with a gig of quality DDR400. All ready for OCing...

              I don't think there's another technology that's really worth it right now.

              PCI-E, SATA and whatnot are not where they need to be yet...

              Comment

              • DentyCracker
                Super MURCer
                • Jan 2000
                • 2023

                #22
                I 'll probably upgrade to a non FX A-64 4000+ on Socket 939 SiS chipset mobo around Xmas, will keep current rig as main working rig. Probably get an All-In-Wonder Radeon of some sort to go in the new rig (although I still pH33r ATi's drivers). I have a Dell Dimension P4 2.8GHz machine that just feels slower than my AthlonXP running at 2100 MHz. This sluggishness persists even after wiping and reinstalling winxp without Dell's crap, but including the Intel chipset drivers
                [size=1]D3/\/7YCR4CK3R
                Ryzen: Asrock B450M Pro4, Ryzen 5 2600, 16GB G-Skill Ripjaws V Series DDR4 PC4-25600 RAM, 1TB Seagate SATA HD, 256GB myDigital PCIEx4 M.2 SSD, Samsung LI24T350FHNXZA 24" HDMI LED monitor, Klipsch Promedia 4.2 400, Win11
                Home: M1 Mac Mini 8GB 256GB
                Surgery: HP Stream 200-010 Mini Desktop,Intel Celeron 2957U Processor, 6 GB RAM, ADATA 128 GB SSD, Win 10 home ver 22H2
                Frontdesk: Beelink T4 8GB

                Comment

                • DentyCracker
                  Super MURCer
                  • Jan 2000
                  • 2023

                  #23
                  Actually I think the real reason it is sluggish is the lack of RAM, only a piddling 256 MB. Blasted tight CEO
                  [size=1]D3/\/7YCR4CK3R
                  Ryzen: Asrock B450M Pro4, Ryzen 5 2600, 16GB G-Skill Ripjaws V Series DDR4 PC4-25600 RAM, 1TB Seagate SATA HD, 256GB myDigital PCIEx4 M.2 SSD, Samsung LI24T350FHNXZA 24" HDMI LED monitor, Klipsch Promedia 4.2 400, Win11
                  Home: M1 Mac Mini 8GB 256GB
                  Surgery: HP Stream 200-010 Mini Desktop,Intel Celeron 2957U Processor, 6 GB RAM, ADATA 128 GB SSD, Win 10 home ver 22H2
                  Frontdesk: Beelink T4 8GB

                  Comment

                  • J1NG
                    Super MURCer
                    • Feb 2000
                    • 1388

                    #24
                    Buy processor? Upgrade? Again? Pffff!

                    J1NG

                    |
                    |
                    V

                    Comment

                    • Ribbit
                      Super MURCer
                      • Apr 2001
                      • 1174

                      #25
                      Originally posted by bsdgeek
                      ....the junk I have (....Tiger MPX that I never used....
                      You bastard.

                      And you too, J1NG.
                      Blah blah blah nick blah blah confusion, blah blah blah blah frog.

                      Comment

                      • J1NG
                        Super MURCer
                        • Feb 2000
                        • 1388

                        #26
                        From the looks of things, if any of you are going for AMD 64 (+ variants; FX, Opteron etc) you're stuck with ATX/EATX till late 2005 at the earliest. Same with DDR2 unless it comes down in price real quick. PCI eXpress, sure that's not too far off. But the first two is unlikely to arrive till late next year. If then at all.

                        J1NG

                        Comment

                        • Chrono_Wanderer
                          Super MURCer
                          • Mar 2002
                          • 2540

                          #27
                          ya... agree with J1NG. Just look at CeBit... I have seen lots of BTX boards w/PGA755, PCI-E etc... but NONE for A64.

                          And where the hack is SiS... they have been awefully quiet...

                          Comment

                          • UtwigMU
                            Super MURCer
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 5651

                            #28
                            The MSI boards, the pics of which floated arround, were DDR2 i925 with PCI Express, yet still ATX.

                            Comment

                            • rylan
                              Super MURCer
                              • Sep 1999
                              • 2347

                              #29
                              I don't know why people would be excited about BTX, its a terrible layout, and DDR2 is a joke if it costs any more than low latency 400MHZ+ ddr.

                              Comment

                              • Wombat
                                Super MURCer
                                • Aug 2000
                                • 9498

                                #30
                                What's wrong with BTX?
                                Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

                                Comment

                                Working...