highest performance PCI card?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gangster
    MURCer
    • Aug 2003
    • 316

    #1

    highest performance PCI card?

    is there a faster gaming choice than the ati 9100 128mb pci card? i can still get one that's 250/500mhz and retail.

    i need one for my little brothers box which doesn't have agp nor can he upgrade the mb.
    P4b@2.7, AOpen ax4spe max II, 4X Parhelia 128 with Zalman zm80c and fan -or- ATI Radeon X800GTO, 1024mb.
  • rylan
    Super MURCer
    • Sep 1999
    • 2347

    #2
    Fyi, odds are a better pci graphics card isn't going to do much if anything, since that system is going to be limited by the cpu and pci bus bandwidth.

    Comment

    • gangster
      MURCer
      • Aug 2003
      • 316

      #3
      yes, thanks, but its all he has to work with........................so...............
      P4b@2.7, AOpen ax4spe max II, 4X Parhelia 128 with Zalman zm80c and fan -or- ATI Radeon X800GTO, 1024mb.

      Comment

      • UtwigMU
        Super MURCer
        • Jul 2002
        • 5651

        #4
        There are FX5600/5700 PCI cards R9100/9000, GF4MX PCI and of course Parhelia PCI, which is the best but also most expensive by far.

        Comment

        • gangster
          MURCer
          • Aug 2003
          • 316

          #5
          thanks
          P4b@2.7, AOpen ax4spe max II, 4X Parhelia 128 with Zalman zm80c and fan -or- ATI Radeon X800GTO, 1024mb.

          Comment

          • Ribbit
            Super MURCer
            • Apr 2001
            • 1174

            #6
            I don't know where the FX cards fit in, but in terms of raw performance the 9100 is faster than the 9000 and about same as the 8500, which is a bit faster than the (original) Parhelia, and will be far faster than the GF4MX. Also, 9100s seem to be hard to come by these days, and PCI versions must be like hens' teeth, so my advice is grab that 9100 while you can.

            re:rylan - perhaps you won't be able to cram more texture and geometry data down the bus, but a faster card should translate to higher-res textures, better framerates/resolution/FSAA, etc. so it should still be a benefit.
            Blah blah blah nick blah blah confusion, blah blah blah blah frog.

            Comment

            • gangster
              MURCer
              • Aug 2003
              • 316

              #7
              i found a retail 9100 128mb pci and ordered it, $69 delivered.
              P4b@2.7, AOpen ax4spe max II, 4X Parhelia 128 with Zalman zm80c and fan -or- ATI Radeon X800GTO, 1024mb.

              Comment

              • rylan
                Super MURCer
                • Sep 1999
                • 2347

                #8
                Oh duh.. for some reason I read this thread as you already had a 9100 and were looking for something better than that.

                Comment

                • Wombat
                  Super MURCer
                  • Aug 2000
                  • 9498

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Ribbit
                  I don't know where the FX cards fit in, but in terms of raw performance the 9100 is faster than the 9000 and about same as the 8500,
                  I thought a 9100 *was* an 8500, underclocked?
                  Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

                  Comment

                  • Jon P. Inghram
                    Super MURCer
                    • Oct 1999
                    • 3878

                    #10
                    It is, just a different firmware flash.

                    Comment

                    Working...