5 years warranty for seagate HDs

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Umfriend
    Crabby Smurf
    • Mar 2001
    • 7308

    #16
    Schomfest,

    AFAIK, the Cheetahs have microcode aimed at server applications wheras the raptors supposedly are optimised for desktop usage.

    I think I read something to that extent a while ago at www.storagereview.com

    On their main poage there is interesting stuff about whether t stripe or not as well. Have a look I would suggest.
    Join MURCs Distributed Computing effort for Rosetta@Home and help fight Alzheimers, Cancer, Mad Cow disease and rising oil prices.
    [...]the pervading principle and abiding test of good breeding is the requirement of a substantial and patent waste of time. - Veblen

    Comment

    • schmosef
      Super MURCer
      • Dec 2002
      • 5813

      #17
      Thanks for the link. A good read.
      P.S. You've been Spanked!

      Comment

      • VJ
        Moderator
        • Mar 2001
        • 9733

        #18
        Originally posted by Umfriend
        Schomfest,

        AFAIK, the Cheetahs have microcode aimed at server applications wheras the raptors supposedly are optimised for desktop usage.
        I have a Seagate Cheetah 10K.6 in my workstation. The SeaTools software allow one to adjust parameters to set the drive optimally for server or for workstation use. (it mainly concerns the principles of the cache)


        Jörg
        pixar
        Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die tomorrow. (James Dean)

        Comment

        • leech
          Super MURCer
          • Oct 1999
          • 1918

          #19
          While on the subject of hard drives... I have an External enclosure... well, this is my second one, actually. The first one was USB2 only, and while it worked great, anytime I connected another USB2 hard drive, my hard drive would 'disappear'. So then I thought at first it was due to the Device ID or something conflicting (the first time I tried it, the enclosures were of the same type) but then I tried it with different enclosures and got the same thing...

          So now the second enclosure I have, is Firewire/USB2... but when I have it connected to the USB2, I have the same problem as I did before... as soon another USB2 drive is plugged in, this one disappears... so then I plug it into the Firewire port on my Audigy 2. The problem is, when I try to transfer over a large file (either copying to or copying from.. I think both, but maybe it's just when I copy it from another hard drive to this one) then it freaks out and times out then the drive disappears again.. and the busy light goes continuous until I turn it off and reboot the drive.

          Any ideas? It uses the Prolific chip. (PL 3507) I found a forum about Firmware updates, but no site has them, and the people that say "email me for the firmware" never replied... or couldn't email me the file (and they didn't explain very well... probably due to lack of being native english speakers)

          Leech
          Wah! Wah!

          In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.

          Comment

          • Sasq
            Administrator
            • Jan 2001
            • 4633

            #20
            Leech, try here http://member.newsguy.com/~siccos/PL3507%20Firmware.htm

            or here...

            Last edited by Sasq; 29 July 2004, 16:53.
            Juu nin to iro


            English doesn't borrow from other languages. It follows them down dark alleys, knocks them over, and goes through their pockets for loose grammar.

            Comment

            • Johnny Ray
              MURCer
              • Sep 1999
              • 406

              #21
              Hey, my harddrives have always had five-year warranties. There are advantages to SCSI, other than just the lightening of the wallet.

              Comment

              • xortam
                Super MURCer
                • Sep 1999
                • 4534

                #22
                I've always been strictly SCSI but I finally went with ATA in my brand new PC. Video is just too consuming and I would never spend the money on SCSI for multiple terabytes. I'll be chewing through 100 GB/week for a while so I'm going for big ATA drives on sale and throw them in my removable rack. It also gets hard to pony up for backups of multiple terabytes.
                <TABLE BGCOLOR=Red><TR><TD><Font-weight="+1"><font COLOR=Black>The world just changed, Sep. 11, 2001</font></Font-weight></TR></TD></TABLE>

                Comment

                • Wombat
                  Super MURCer
                  • Aug 2000
                  • 9498

                  #23
                  At those volumes, have you considered tape backup?
                  Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

                  Comment

                  • Dr Mordrid
                    Moderator
                    • Apr 2001
                    • 26592

                    #24
                    Tape has a big disadvantage with large volumes of data: speed, or lack of same. HDD backups are much faster, particularly of large projects like archiving video projects or DVD images.

                    For a busy videographer how long it takes to move all that data off the RAID so he can start new projects is no small deal.

                    Dr. Mordrid
                    Last edited by Dr Mordrid; 31 July 2004, 12:48.
                    Dr. Mordrid
                    ----------------------------
                    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

                    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

                    Comment

                    • xortam
                      Super MURCer
                      • Sep 1999
                      • 4534

                      #25
                      ... also HDD costs have come down so much and capacities increased so much that tape has lost a lot of its appeal. The current market of < $0.75/GB price on large HDDs means that it's the right solution now. It gets difficult managing terabytes of data. DLT isn't even adequate without a large jukebox which isn't practical in most homes. Image backup to HDD is also more prevalent these days in the Enterprise.

                      I just plop in a new HDD into my removable rack and I'm good to go for archiving or system backup. The aluminum rack has a S-ATA/P-ATA converter which provides for the S-ATA interface. This allows for use of the smaller cables for good airflow and it also operates at S-SATAs 150 vs. 133 transfer speed while taking advantage of the lower P-ATA HDD price. Just store the HDDs in an appropriate location and you've got yourself some high density storage of your video library. I'll be putting it all on-line when I start buying the terabyte NAS boxes (JBOD and RAID).
                      <TABLE BGCOLOR=Red><TR><TD><Font-weight="+1"><font COLOR=Black>The world just changed, Sep. 11, 2001</font></Font-weight></TR></TD></TABLE>

                      Comment

                      • Wombat
                        Super MURCer
                        • Aug 2000
                        • 9498

                        #26
                        The speeds I see at work aren't too bad. The tape drives I develop for perform read/write at 50-120MB/second sustained. The drive cost may be high, but the tapes themselves are about 20-40 cents/GB.
                        Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

                        Comment

                        • xortam
                          Super MURCer
                          • Sep 1999
                          • 4534

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Wombat
                          The speeds I see at work aren't too bad. The tape drives I develop for perform read/write at 50-120MB/second sustained. The drive cost may be high, but the tapes themselves are about 20-40 cents/GB.
                          I'm not quite up on the latest in Enterprise tape systems as I've been essentially retired for over five years now. What are the tape capacities these days? I'm pretty much getting completely away from tape and l look forward to archiving any worthwhile content off of the old S-VHS tapes so I can get them out of here. Tape has too many drawbacks and I need the random access and high capacity/transfer rates from HDD for my video applications.

                          BTW ... I didn't know you went back to work. How long have you been re-employed? What are you doing if I may ask?
                          <TABLE BGCOLOR=Red><TR><TD><Font-weight="+1"><font COLOR=Black>The world just changed, Sep. 11, 2001</font></Font-weight></TR></TD></TABLE>

                          Comment

                          • Wombat
                            Super MURCer
                            • Aug 2000
                            • 9498

                            #28
                            LTO tech. is 200/400GB native/compressed. LTO-2 is on the horizon and should double that. Sony's SAIT is 500/1300GB.
                            Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

                            Comment

                            • agallag
                              Super MURCer
                              • Aug 1999
                              • 3201

                              #29
                              Unfortunately, the drives start at about $3-4000. That puts them out of reach of home users.

                              Anyway, for long term archiving, tapes are still the best bet for the enterprise, but for near-line backup hard disks can't be beat.
                              Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox

                              Comment

                              • Wombat
                                Super MURCer
                                • Aug 2000
                                • 9498

                                #30
                                There's still the 8mm market. I'm playing with some nifty stuff there, too. Generally much cheaper.
                                Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

                                Comment

                                Working...