XP SP2 and DEP throws a wobbler

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The PIT
    Super MURCer
    • Aug 1999
    • 11901

    #1

    XP SP2 and DEP throws a wobbler

    One XP machine I've upgraded is having a fit with DEP. Doesn't matter how I set the options under system > performance it keeps flashing up warning and error messages about svhost having been blocked.

    Sadly it doesn't tell me which programme is causing the problem.
    Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
    Weather nut and sad git.

    My Weather Page
  • ayoub_ibrahim
    Super MURCer
    • Dec 1999
    • 2445

    #2
    is this with an amd 64 cpu?

    Comment

    • The PIT
      Super MURCer
      • Aug 1999
      • 11901

      #3
      Nope Intel.
      Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
      Weather nut and sad git.

      My Weather Page

      Comment

      • The PIT
        Super MURCer
        • Aug 1999
        • 11901

        #4
        Looks like I can turn it of via the boot.ini.

        Ms says you can do it vis system but I don't have the option if I remember correctly.

        The error can be caused by programmes or drivers. My choice of culprits are

        1) Creative
        2) ATI
        3) Nortons
        Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
        Weather nut and sad git.

        My Weather Page

        Comment

        • ayoub_ibrahim
          Super MURCer
          • Dec 1999
          • 2445

          #5
          you should find it under system properties>advanced>performance>settings>data execution prevention.

          Comment

          • The PIT
            Super MURCer
            • Aug 1999
            • 11901

            #6
            I know where it is but the option too turn it off isn't there as it should be.
            So boot ini is the only other option.
            oops I read the page wrong it's boot.ini only.

            Well I done it and it works without a problem.
            Last edited by The PIT; 13 August 2004, 10:39.
            Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
            Weather nut and sad git.

            My Weather Page

            Comment

            • [GDI]Raptor
              Super MURCer
              • Jan 2001
              • 1045

              #7
              I thougt Intel didn't have DEP (NX-bit) in their processors except Itanium II

              And that it would be included in the new F and J Pentium 4's and Xeons...

              I use SP2 and DEP on my Athlon 64 with no problems...

              Comment

              • Elie
                MURC Writer
                • Aug 1999
                • 4420

                #8
                How do you disable it in boot.ini?

                Thanks,
                Elie

                Comment

                • Elie
                  MURC Writer
                  • Aug 1999
                  • 4420

                  #9
                  Actually found this on the net...
                  -------------------------------------------------------
                  Try disabling DEP (Data Execution Protection) by editing your boot.ini file.

                  Remove the switch that says "/NoExecute=OptIn" (or =OptOut if you changed settings) and use the switch "/Execute"

                  Reboot.

                  HTH
                  --------------------------------------------

                  Comment

                  • DGhost
                    Super MURCer
                    • May 2000
                    • 2573

                    #10
                    Originally posted by [GDI]Raptor
                    I thougt Intel didn't have DEP (NX-bit) in their processors except Itanium II

                    And that it would be included in the new F and J Pentium 4's and Xeons...

                    I use SP2 and DEP on my Athlon 64 with no problems...
                    they were able to update the HAL to implement a software version of it for system files only...
                    "And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz

                    Comment

                    • Maggi
                      Super MURCer
                      • Jan 2000
                      • 5057

                      #11
                      details on this very issue, directly from the horses mouth:
                      http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro.../sp2mempr.mspx

                      I had to alter my boot.ini to /noexecute=AlwaysOff in order to make the current HASP drivers working

                      btw, anybody got a clue why the feck MS marks the boot.ini as read-only, during installation of SP2 ???
                      Despite my nickname causing confusion, I am not female ...

                      ASRock Fatal1ty X79 Professional
                      Intel Core i7-3930K@4.3GHz
                      be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 2
                      4x 8GB G.Skill TridentX PC3-19200U@CR1
                      2x MSI N670GTX PE OC (SLI)
                      OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
                      4x2TB Seagate Barracuda Green 5900.3 (2x4TB RAID0)
                      Super Flower Golden Green Modular 800W
                      Nanoxia Deep Silence 1
                      LG BH10LS38
                      LG DM2752D 27" 3D

                      Comment

                      • The PIT
                        Super MURCer
                        • Aug 1999
                        • 11901

                        #12
                        I think by default it's a read only hidden file if I recall correctly.
                        Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
                        Weather nut and sad git.

                        My Weather Page

                        Comment

                        • Maggi
                          Super MURCer
                          • Jan 2000
                          • 5057

                          #13
                          I just cross checked and it is hidden in all cases, but neither Win2k nor WinXP SP1 had it marked as read-only, so that's a new security feature from WinXP SP2 ...

                          as if that would change a damned thing
                          Despite my nickname causing confusion, I am not female ...

                          ASRock Fatal1ty X79 Professional
                          Intel Core i7-3930K@4.3GHz
                          be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 2
                          4x 8GB G.Skill TridentX PC3-19200U@CR1
                          2x MSI N670GTX PE OC (SLI)
                          OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
                          4x2TB Seagate Barracuda Green 5900.3 (2x4TB RAID0)
                          Super Flower Golden Green Modular 800W
                          Nanoxia Deep Silence 1
                          LG BH10LS38
                          LG DM2752D 27" 3D

                          Comment

                          Working...