Orion 96 CPU desktop workstation.....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dr Mordrid
    Moderator
    • Apr 2001
    • 26592

    #1

    Orion 96 CPU desktop workstation.....

    Orion's DS-96 deskside Cluster Workstation has 96 nodes with 300 gigaflops (Gflops) peak performance (150 Gflops sustained), up to 192 gigabytes of memory and up to 9.6 terabytes of storage. It consumes less than 1500 watts and fits unobtrusively under a desk.
    http://arstechnica.com/news/posts/20040830-4142.html



    Maybe I can talk Ulead into porting MSPro 8 to the Orion?

    Dr. Mordrid
    Last edited by Dr Mordrid; 31 August 2004, 16:25.
    Dr. Mordrid
    ----------------------------
    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps
  • Ribbit
    Super MURCer
    • Apr 2001
    • 1174

    #2
    With AMD's (and Intel's?) dual-core processors coming, I think the 12-processor version will turn out to be stillborn. Transmeta chips aren't exactly renowned (or designed) for speed, and an n-core multiprocessor will have much better inter-"node" communication.

    But to put 96 processors under my desk? Man, I wish I had a use for that... :drool:
    Blah blah blah nick blah blah confusion, blah blah blah blah frog.

    Comment

    • Chrono_Wanderer
      Super MURCer
      • Mar 2002
      • 2540

      #3
      that's the minimum requirements for longhorn....

      Comment

      • Jammrock
        The Berserker
        • Aug 1999
        • 8661

        #4
        lol... Bill said they're scaling down Longhorn so the minimum system requirements is only 4 CPUs.

        Jammrock
        “Inside every sane person there’s a madman struggling to get out”
        –The Light Fantastic, Terry Pratchett

        Comment

        • Chrono_Wanderer
          Super MURCer
          • Mar 2002
          • 2540

          #5
          Off topic:

          http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1641491,00.asp

          Looks like Microsoft is dropping WinFS

          Comment

          • schmosef
            Super MURCer
            • Dec 2002
            • 5813

            #6
            It's just like what happened to the Cairo tech. Cairo got re-purposed as a suite of technologies under development for eventual implementation instead of being Windows 2000, as it was originally described. I'm not too surprised.
            P.S. You've been Spanked!

            Comment

            • Rakido
              Super MURCer
              • Feb 2000
              • 1313

              #7
              and here's the low-budget version for the small wallet:

              Orion DT-12
              The Orion DT-12 desktop cluster workstation is the highest performance general-purpose desktop computer available today.

              It has 12 nodes, 36 Gflops peak processing performance (18 gigaflops sustained*), 24 gigabytes of DDR SDRAM memory, and 1 terabyte of internal disk storage. It plugs into a standard 15A wall-socket, consumes a peak of 220 watts, and is about the same size as a PC.
              "Women don't want to hear a man's opinion, they just want to hear their opinion in a deeper voice."

              Comment

              • ZokesPro
                Serial Murcerer
                • Sep 2000
                • 8325

                #8
                Originally posted by Chrono_Wanderer
                that's the minimum requirements for longhorn....
                lol
                Titanium is the new bling!
                (you heard from me first!)

                Comment

                • Ribbit
                  Super MURCer
                  • Apr 2001
                  • 1174

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Rakido
                  and here's the low-budget version for the small wallet:
                  As I said above, I expect this one to be overtaken by SMP dual-core systems in short order.
                  Blah blah blah nick blah blah confusion, blah blah blah blah frog.

                  Comment

                  • Technoid
                    Super MURCer
                    • Sep 1999
                    • 7645

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Chrono_Wanderer
                    Off topic:

                    http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1641491,00.asp

                    Looks like Microsoft is dropping WinFS
                    no wonder that they did that, it would have meant that no old software would have run at all
                    If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.

                    Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."

                    Comment

                    • Tjalfe
                      Super MURCer
                      • Nov 2002
                      • 3053

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Technoid
                      no wonder that they did that, it would have meant that no old software would have run at all
                      old software still runs on NTFS, I am sure they would make it possible on WinFS
                      We have enough youth - What we need is a fountain of smart!


                      i7-920, 6GB DDR3-1600, HD4870X2, Dell 27" LCD

                      Comment

                      • Technoid
                        Super MURCer
                        • Sep 1999
                        • 7645

                        #12
                        Originally posted by tjalfe
                        old software still runs on NTFS, I am sure they would make it possible on WinFS
                        First of all, MS themself said that it would break 100% of old software because WinFS was totally diffrent from fat/fat32, ntfs etc etc.

                        there would have been no files or folders in winfs,only database entries
                        If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.

                        Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."

                        Comment

                        • spadnos
                          MURCer
                          • Jun 2002
                          • 859

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Ribbit
                          As I said above, I expect this one to be overtaken by SMP dual-core systems in short order.
                          The power usage is pretty amazing.

                          The opterons take between 65W and 90W per CPU, and that's for single core. For the same power, you could only run a dual processor system, and only single if the dual-core processors use appreciably more power than the single-core CPUs.

                          Actually, (if they're not full of crap) the sustained performance of 18 GFlops / 220 W is damned amazing - 12W / GFlop.

                          Holy cow.

                          (think back to the days of the Cray X-MP - 1 GFlop in only 12KW )

                          - Steve

                          Comment

                          • Wombat
                            Super MURCer
                            • Aug 2000
                            • 9498

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Ribbit
                            With AMD's (and Intel's?) dual-core processors coming, I think the 12-processor version will turn out to be stillborn. Transmeta chips aren't exactly renowned (or designed) for speed, and an n-core multiprocessor will have much better inter-"node" communication.

                            But to put 96 processors under my desk? Man, I wish I had a use for that... :drool:
                            Gotta disagree with you there. Transmeta has some interesting rackmount and beowulf setups thanks to the great processing/wattage ratio.
                            Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

                            Comment

                            • Liquid Snake
                              Super MURCer
                              • Aug 1999
                              • 2216

                              #15


                              I see on this page that the 96-node version consumes 1500 Watts. I wonder what kind of cooling system it has if it can cool all of that in an "unobstrusive box under a desk."

                              Comment

                              Working...