Stability of new Beta OGL ICD for 5.25?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Rev
    MURCer
    • Aug 1999
    • 117

    #1

    Stability of new Beta OGL ICD for 5.25?

    Before I try out PD 5.25 with the new Beta OpenGL ICD posted, I was wondering if it had any major/annoying problems so far that should be made aware?

    Thanks,
    -The-Rev-

    P.S. Sorry for not posting lately...
  • Elie
    MURC Writer
    • Aug 1999
    • 4420

    #2
    All you have to do is backup your existing copy of the g400icd.dll file and download the new one and install it.

    So far it's running great for me.

    Good luck.
    Elie

    Comment

    • Kruzin
      Jeepin' to the grave
      • Aug 1999
      • 6527

      #3
      It's a beta.
      It's likely not to be as stable as the ICD in the driver package..but should be faster in some games (you will probably see a jump in Q2 fps, but not as much in Q3)
      Core2 Duo E7500 2.93, Asus P5Q Pro Turbo, 4gig 1066 DDR2, 1gig Asus ENGTS250, SB X-Fi Gamer ,WD Caviar Black 1tb, Plextor PX-880SA, Dual Samsung 2494s

      Comment

      • The Rev
        MURCer
        • Aug 1999
        • 117

        #4
        A big question to everyone (especially the Beta Testers):

        The modify date of the G400ICD.dll from PD 5-25:
        Tuesday, September 07, 1999 3:49:14 PM

        The modify date of the BETA G400ICD.dll just placed on Matrox's website:
        Tuesday, July 06, 1999 5:28:22 PM

        It looks as if this beta OpenGL ICD hasn't been touched in 2 months! That's pretty old. Why were these beta OGL ICD drivers not posted 1-2 months ago? Does Matrox delay the public released Beta drivers?

        I guess it really doesn't matter much as long as these beta drivers give better performance.

        Just sounded kinda odd,
        -The-Rev-

        Comment

        • Scytale
          MURCer
          • Aug 1999
          • 764

          #5
          P3@600 | Abit BH6 V1.01 NV | 256MB PC133 | G400MAX (EU,AGP2X) | Quantum Atlas 10K | Hitachi CDR-8330 | Diamond FirePort 40 | 3c905B-TX | TB Montego A3D(1) | IntelliMouse Explorer | Iiyama VisionMaster Pro 17 | Win2K/NT4

          Comment

          • The Rev
            MURCer
            • Aug 1999
            • 117

            #6
            Kruzin: Just heard your response to my above post. Thanks for clearing that up!

            -The-Rev-

            Comment

            • Nuno
              Super MURCer
              • Aug 1999
              • 2155

              #7
              I´m sticking with 5.25(or 5.21) ICD. With 5.13.21 HexenII doesn´t work (not a big deal, though), and half-life displays texture corruptions "à la" g200, that I´ve not yet seen in the G400. It seems to have some kind of memory leak, because 5 minutes after playing, the framerates almost halve, without any noticeable cause.

              Much more important is that 5.25 seems to have fixed the rebel icons flying around issue. That workaround hack did´t work for me and now it seem to be gone. Let´s wait and see.

              Comment

              • IlleglWpns
                mini MURCer
                • Aug 1999
                • 16

                #8
                Actually the situation with me is the opposite. Minor gains in Q2, significant increases on Q3test 1.06. I've seen around a 5 fps improvement in both demo1 and demo2 in the lower resolutions. Haven't tested the higher ones yet.

                The direct3d drivers have improved too, they went from ver 4.11.01.1210 to 4.11.01.1250. 3dmark scores improved slightly, have yet to test other games.

                Overall, very worth the download. Keep up the good work Matrox!

                Comment

                Working...