why...??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nyquist
    mini MURCer
    • May 2000
    • 1

    #1

    why...??

    New chip of Matrox, G450!!
    Why G450, not G800???

    ^__^
  • Maggi
    Super MURCer
    • Jan 2000
    • 5057

    #2
    ... because the G800 is not yet announced ...
    Despite my nickname causing confusion, I am not female ...

    ASRock Fatal1ty X79 Professional
    Intel Core i7-3930K@4.3GHz
    be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 2
    4x 8GB G.Skill TridentX PC3-19200U@CR1
    2x MSI N670GTX PE OC (SLI)
    OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
    4x2TB Seagate Barracuda Green 5900.3 (2x4TB RAID0)
    Super Flower Golden Green Modular 800W
    Nanoxia Deep Silence 1
    LG BH10LS38
    LG DM2752D 27" 3D

    Comment

    • Rohde
      mini MURCer
      • Aug 1999
      • 92

      #3
      The above reason +

      The goal of the G800 is that it should support all the features in the upcoming Direct X 8.0, and since the 8.0 isn't out yet......

      There are probably also classical market mechanisems involved. Why release the G800 if you can still G400 based (G450) cards. The sooner you start selling G800's, the sooner you'll have to start developing the G1600.

      Torben R.
      G400 news, info, downloads and mailinglist : http://TRsDomain.homepage.dk

      Comment

      • Snake-Eyes
        Super MURCer
        • Sep 1999
        • 1187

        #4
        Hehe. If Matrox gets some sort of announcement out in the next few weeks, I may have to forget about the GeForce II and just wait the four months to get one (delay based on my G400Max pre-order to receipt). The wait would probably be worth it, if they delivered that soon, at least if it's as good as my Max has been.

        ------------------
        Ace
        "..so much for subtlety.."

        System specs:
        Gainward Ti4600
        AMD Athlon XP2100+ (o.c. to 1845MHz)

        Comment

        • Pace
          Super MURCer
          • Feb 2000
          • 3414

          #5
          Hmm, G400 waiting. I waited 3 months for my G400 MAX which I ordered at the same time as my 19" monitor. After being told that I would've had to have waited another month or so at least I cancelled my order (and then incidentally picked up a TNT2 32Mb for £5 (~$8)). Been waiting for a prize draw or new product ever since...

          Also, anybody else tried 2048x1536 on a TNT2? Bwahahahaha. What's it like on anybody's G400's?

          In G450/800/1600 anticipation,

          Paul.
          Meet Jasmine.
          flickr.com/photos/pace3000

          Comment

          • CannyOne
            MURCer
            • Oct 1999
            • 176

            #6
            I'd buy a G450 today if it was available. Not because it's revolutionary, but because it is a refinement of my current G400MAX. Oh, and I do happen to have the money right now. I just don't want to spend it on a GeFarse!!!

            I'll also find it compulsory to spring for the G800 when it arrives. Yes, I know I'm a sick, sick, person. But, as Dad used to say, "you gotta have priorities". I tend to stick with a company when I like their products. And the G400s I've bought have been really good!
            <a href="http://www.gaijindesign.com/lawriemalen/jedi" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.gaijindesign.com/lawriemalen/jedi/yoda.jpg" width="285" height="123" border="0"><br>:: how jedi are you? ::</a>

            Comment

            • Paddy
              Super MURCer
              • Mar 2000
              • 6067

              #7
              How many G400s do you need?
              The Welsh support two teams when it comes to rugby. Wales of course, and anyone else playing England

              Comment

              • CrazyBee
                MURCer
                • Aug 1999
                • 138

                #8
                I really don't think the G450 is that much of an advancement. They took one step forward and another back. Advanced its technology with it being .18 and better RAM.. BUT no compatibility with the Rainbow Runner G series.. which is what I consider to be a step back.

                The reason I bought my G400 was for the dualhead and multimedia capabilities.. its not too bad for games but the whole dualhead/multimedia conecpt is what makes this card kickass and unique.

                My .02
                Abit BX6 Rev.1
                Celeron 366A PPGA @ 566, 2.1v
                192 meg RAM, CAS2
                13.0 gig Maxtor 4320 HD
                6.0 gig Maxtor (in removeable drive bay)
                HP8110i 4x2x24
                Pioneer DVD-104
                SB Live! 1024
                USB ZIP 100
                G400 32MB DH 5ns RAM at 187/211
                Two KDS 17" Trinitron monitors
                YAMAHA HTR-5140 Reciever

                Comment

                Working...