review at hartware.net

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thop
    Super MURCer
    • Mar 2001
    • 2536

    #1

    review at hartware.net

    here
    site is very slow, havent read all yet. ah it is in german again.

    they pit it against two GF3, the Kyro2 and the G400MAX
    and it even gets beaten by the GF3 and even the Kyro2 in some tests
    Last edited by thop; 25 June 2002, 02:59.
    no matrox, no matroxusers.
  • DrDS
    mini MURCer
    • Jun 2002
    • 8

    #2
    Oh well, it's the Berezina !!!

    A ti200 and a kyro2 are above the parhelia...

    It's a joke
    PIII-S 1.4 GHz / 512 Mo SDRAM / ASUS Tuls2-c / GF2MX / Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 920 - DualBoot: Win XP Pro / Debian 2.2
    Waiting for my Parhelia...

    Comment

    • torhelge
      mini MURCer
      • Oct 2001
      • 7

      #3
      hmm.. all sites that are putting up really bad reviews about Parhelia are really slow.... is it accidental ?

      Comment

      • SteveC
        Super MURCer
        • Aug 1999
        • 3540

        #4
        Heh heh - never thought a G400 would outperform a Parhelia (even if it is only one test!)

        Dungeon Seige, 32 bit, 800x600:

        Comment

        • Rimfaxe
          MURCer
          • Sep 1999
          • 214

          #5
          Originally posted by SteveC
          Heh heh - never thought a G400 would outperform a Parhelia (even if it is only one test!)

          Dungeon Seige, 32 bit, 800x600:

          http://www.hartware.net/review.html?id=233&page=11
          OMG !!!

          How could that be ??? Damn, I don't know what to say...

          Comment

          • Hefa
            mini MURCer
            • Jun 2002
            • 23

            #6
            if G400 MAX can beat parhelia (even in one benchmark)... they definitely have some driver problems !
            AMDXP1700+@2000Mhz/EP-8K3A+/Maxtor120GB/512MB DDR/Matox Parhelia 128MB Retail
            And a REAL OS: Gentoo Linux

            Comment

            • Marshmallowman
              Super MURCer
              • Sep 1999
              • 3416

              #7
              The good hi-res and raw texture throughput are a good sign.

              Bad perfomance at low res is usualy a sign of unoptimised drivers so there is hope for some real performance increases over the coming months.

              anyone done any testing using DX9 beta?

              Comment

              Working...