But the current driver is the third released Parhelia driver from Matrox.
-
-
Don't forget that they had to start from scratch, where as nobody else had to.....Let us return to the moon, to stay!!!Comment
-
What about ATI with the R9700? Its pretty different from the R8500.Originally posted by K6-III
Don't forget that they had to start from scratch, where as nobody else had to.....Why is it called tourist season, if we can't shoot at them?Comment
-
Still the 9700 driver bases on the old Radeon family driver set. It's even the same driver archive that is used for all Radeon based cards from the original Radeon over the Radeon8500/7500 up to the R9000 and R9700.
Sure there must be new code parts but the majority seems to be at least heavily based on old driver sets.Comment
-
...and even that is still based off the old Rage128 drivers...Let us return to the moon, to stay!!!Comment
-
Yes, but they're all 1.00, meaning most of the differences between them are specific bug fixes. Like I said before, 1.01 will be better. It contains new optimizations.Originally posted by albatorsk
But the current driver is the third released Parhelia driver from Matrox.Comment
-
According to the blurb on the download agreement page, this patch is not required for Windows XP.Originally posted by albatorsk
Thanks!! I will try these things out later tonight and let you know of how it goes!
About the AGP patch: Does it work in XP? Or is it "2000 only"? What I mean is, since it's from september 2000, is there any risk of it screwing up WindowsXP?
To be honest, I'd be suprised if M$ hadnt included this in SP1 or later for 2000.Athlon XP-64/3200, 1gb PC3200, 512mb Radeon X1950Pro AGP, Dell 2005fwp, Logitech G5, IBM model M.Comment
-
Whoops. Missed that one. Anyway, applied the patch, and there was no difference. But at least now I know how to boot Windows in UP-mode
Comment
)
Comment