Parhelia. PCI- X

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bigg
    mini MURCer
    • Dec 2002
    • 28

    #16
    Originally posted by Chrono_Wanderer
    I think some versions of the medical parhelia boards are based on PCI-X...

    edit: and of course no PCI-express yet...
    thats cool... a xeon workstation with a p and a r300!!!

    Comment

    • WayneHu
      MURCer
      • Sep 1999
      • 180

      #17
      It seems the PCI Express architecture is similar to the current switch network design. The routing job is still within the the central Hub (main chip) which uses the parallel bus for forwarding or transmittion. Thus the lantency overhead does not look like the stupid RDRAM.

      Of course, there will be some overhead between the protocol conversion like CPU-AGP, CPU-PCI bus bridges, which operates in different speeds, bus widths.

      To take the advantage of serial memory interface, the CPU bus had better be also multiple-channeled serial bus. Thus it can reduced the CPU pin-count for basic performance and is easy to increase the CPU cache replacement efficiency by using multiple cache MMUs which each one is assigned with the different external memory space. The SMP interconnection is much easier in this way. However, the cache coherence issue is still there once the CPU bus contains multiple memory interfaces.

      For the good performance of serial communication, the number of dynamic routing has to be descreased to the mininum value. Otherwise, it will suffer from the latency overhead even the interconnection speed is high.

      Since the current interconnection timing is 2.5GHz, which is a mature electric-optical signal conversion frequency, it might be easy to expand the whole bus topology far away by optical interconnection.
      P4-2.8C, IC7-G, G550

      Comment

      • Wombat
        Super MURCer
        • Aug 2000
        • 9498

        #18
        Optical connections are handy, but only when you're connecting things that you can't get physically close enough for reasonable electrical connections. Conversion between the two mediums is costly and high-latency.
        Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

        Comment

        • Chrono_Wanderer
          Super MURCer
          • Mar 2002
          • 2540

          #19
          Originally posted by Kurt
          PCI 64bits is also better than what we all have...
          Not when Via is doing PCI-X

          Comment

          • The PIT
            Super MURCer
            • Aug 1999
            • 11901

            #20
            I shudder thinking about all the high speed data corruption.
            Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
            Weather nut and sad git.

            My Weather Page

            Comment

            • rylan
              Super MURCer
              • Sep 1999
              • 2347

              #21
              Yeah, if you've got a controler for each pci-x then it runs at full speed. Fear when Via releases their '4-in-1 controler chip'. :P

              Comment

              • Kurt
                Super MURCer
                • Feb 2000
                • 1839

                #22
                Originally posted by The PIT
                I shudder thinking about all the high speed data corruption.
                hmmm...I wonder if there'd be a way to show all that corruption on a screen and create nice video (psychedelic) effects...at least you'd get some benefit from your VIA chipset...

                Comment

                Working...