While we are waiting for a fresh promising post other company still develop powerfull and more powerfull card. What's the point now?
It's correct that the development of a graphic card must be guided from a company (dx 5,6,7,8,9,????)? The engeener itself can't show their own talent creating new solution. They only need to follw the guidelines from big M. Some time ago, Amiga Inc. and Matrox announced a partership. Yes, Matrox Hardware in amigaone. When i asked for this to amiga inc. and Matrox i've got non response.
How can Amiga graphics (Warp3d, Nova) be compatible with a complete different system (DX). The responce was no comment off course.
So it's correct that a card is developed only for a system?
Next Matrox card can be compatible with longhorn, but the other system.?
The problem can be solved only trought a brillant driver development?
Ciao...
It's correct that the development of a graphic card must be guided from a company (dx 5,6,7,8,9,????)? The engeener itself can't show their own talent creating new solution. They only need to follw the guidelines from big M. Some time ago, Amiga Inc. and Matrox announced a partership. Yes, Matrox Hardware in amigaone. When i asked for this to amiga inc. and Matrox i've got non response.
How can Amiga graphics (Warp3d, Nova) be compatible with a complete different system (DX). The responce was no comment off course.
So it's correct that a card is developed only for a system?
Next Matrox card can be compatible with longhorn, but the other system.?
The problem can be solved only trought a brillant driver development?
Ciao...
Comment