Holy s&=t look at this!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Guru
    Super MURCer
    • Nov 1999
    • 6018

    #1

    Holy s&=t look at this!!


    Take a look at #9!!!!!!!!!

    ------------------
    PIII450@558, ABIT BX6-2, 256RAM, G400MAX, SBLIVE, HOTROD-UDMA66
    Join the MURC SETI team @ <A HREF="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_join_form&id=25678


    " TARGET=_blank>http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_join_form&id=25678


    </A>
    According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless...
  • Guru
    Super MURCer
    • Nov 1999
    • 6018

    #2
    And what the hell is a SETIdoubler? http://www.and.or.jp/~metys/seti.html

    ------------------
    PIII450@558, ABIT BX6-2, 256RAM, G400MAX, SBLIVE, HOTROD-UDMA66
    Join the MURC SETI team @ <A HREF="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_join_form&id=25678


    " TARGET=_blank>http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_join_form&id=25678


    </A>


    [This message has been edited by Guru (edited 27 May 2000).]
    According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless...

    Comment

    • Assimilator1
      MURCer
      • Apr 2000
      • 356

      #3
      Hmmm ,I think they're cheating ,someone should tell SETI@home.

      Strange that they have nearly 100 members with 0 WU's?a cover perhaps?

      ------------------
      I guess I won't recruit for my team here TA
      Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, F@H, MW@H, Asteroids@H, LHC@H, Skynet POGS.

      Main rig - Q9550 @3.6 GHz, HD 5850 (Cat 13.1), 4GB DDR2, Win 7 64bit, BOINC 7.2.42
      2nd rig - E5200 @3.73 GHz, GTX 260 c216, 4GB DDR2, Win XP, BOINC 7.2.42

      Comment

      • paulcs
        Super MURCer
        • Jan 2000
        • 3098

        #4
        They must have some awful fast computers in Viet Nam.

        Paul
        paulcs@flashcom.net

        Comment

        • Compton
          MURCer
          • Sep 1999
          • 226

          #5
          I checked out the setidoubler thing. I'm a bit disappointed, I was hoping to get 1600 WUs tonight. It seems to just do a batch download and then process them in order. It doesn't seem to be anything special. They probably don't understand what the word double means.

          Comment

          • jms
            Super MURCer
            • Sep 1999
            • 1040

            #6
            The program seems to be for buffering WUs on a dual CPU system, hence doubler.

            Jan

            [This message has been edited by jms (edited 29 May 2000).]

            Comment

            • Compton
              MURCer
              • Sep 1999
              • 226

              #7
              well then i need to find another CPU...

              Comment

              • KvHagedorn
                Super MURCer
                • Aug 1999
                • 10725

                #8
                The many members might be a cover thing. Look also at the two "other" members who seem to be crunching at an average of a minute or two.. are these aliases for the #1 guy? He must have figured out how to manually alter the result file or something.

                ------------------
                Kind Regards,

                KvH

                Comment

                • SteveC
                  Super MURCer
                  • Aug 1999
                  • 3540

                  #9
                  sad....

                  ------------------
                  Cheers,
                  Steve

                  "Life is what we make of it, yet most of us just fake"

                  Comment

                  • CharlesWA
                    mini MURCer
                    • May 2000
                    • 80

                    #10
                    #9 (21.1 sec. avg. for 984 WUs) and #82 (2 min., 17.6 sec. avg. for 99 WUs) also look very suspecious.

                    Is it time to call in the SETI Police to check this out? Is there even such a thing?

                    What's the fastest legitimate time for a "standard" work unit that anyone has ever heard of (not including those ones that SETI runs through in just a few minutes)? What type of hardware was it on?

                    Charles
                    A few computers, some with Matrox stuff...I'll add details later.

                    Comment

                    • Rattledagger
                      MURCer
                      • Sep 1999
                      • 663

                      #11
                      Charles, if you look on http://seti.mynoggin.net/cgi-bin/table.cgi
                      you will see the fastest is 45 minutes.
                      Since this bench-unit doesn't have gaussian it's faster, but around 10% doesn't have gaussian.

                      Comment

                      Working...