To those who have joined Genome!

[CHHAS]

Just read the 0.91 description, and I'm back in. Provided I can revive my Katmai 500 that is

[Guyver]

Well, since I have over 10GB left on drive 1, and 14.8GB left on drive 2, I don't think that's a problem...

I may end up writing a batch wrapper for Genome to restart it upon death...

Guyv

[-=Narcissus=-]

Hey Guyver, watch out,

You're currently sending results in two accounts (guyver and Guyver). Accounts are case sensitive. If you want to change the account, just edit the ghclient.cfg file. It worked for my team.

Fred

[Guyver]

DOH!

That way I can take 2 places....

LOL - It's fixed now.

I also made a simple batch file to wrap around the ghclient.exe program.

ghclient.bat
-BOF-

@echo off
start /wait ghclient.exe
ghclient.bat

-EOF-

a very simple approach, but it works.

Guyver

[-=Narcissus=-]

Great to have you back CHHAS, welcome back.

Now let's kick some OcUK butt (8th)!

Fred

[Guyver]

I mean, I start the program, go somewhere, come back and it's not running. Maybe 5 of 30 units completed.

It stopped @ 5, 10, 15 units of completion so far.

Guyver

[-=Narcissus=-]

BTW up to 15th!

Hey maybe your hard drive is too full and it can't write the results!

It happened to me a couple on times with S@H (WinNT command line version), and I never was able to get it fixed... It was ok with a different version though...

Your only solutions are a full format or a new computer... That what my father would say . Of course, you could just swap crunching programs on two machines, but that would be much less of a hassle.

Fred

[Pace]

<pre>
Narcissus ......... 390.10 units 20 genes
Rattledagger ...... 288.36 units 13 genes
guyver............. 068.13 units 03 genes
Mich .............. 066.90 units 04 genes
LittleGreenMartians 047.35 units 02 genes
Guyver ............ 036.60 units 02 genes
Ees ............... 019.80 units 01 genes
Pace .............. 017.41 units 01 genes
</pre>



A welcome to M and LGM, and you too Martin? The idea is not to detract from Seti

Paul.

[rocketmanx]

Hey all!
I just converted all my machines over to the Murc Genome effort I still plan on crunching for SETI as I find physics and astro physics a whole lot more interesting than bio-chemistry.(actually as we come to understand physics and things like "string theory" we are going to find that all biology and chemistry is nothing more than energy fields, "gravity", and
time & "space"-is there such a thing as space?
Anyhoo-I like the fact that I can let a work unit run for weeks as I have to manually connect my machines to transmit SETI and consiquently I wind-up with all cached WU's and none actually being worked on. I will be using 6 machines for Genome- a dual 450 1meg Xeon box with half a gig of ram, a dual 700 p3 @ 850mhz with 784 MB, a dual p3 550 @ 616mhz with 256 MB, a new box I just got done with- an athlon 1 gig @ 1120mhz with 128 MB, my wifes new box-i mean computer-an athlon 850 with 128 MB, and the machine I'm on now-at work- a dell inspiron 7500 p3 450- upgrade- to a 750 with 512 MB. I have a network of 15 machines here at my busines but have to be able to hide the client as my brother is little too practical for these types of things. I am going to try running genome and seti together on my boxes at home to see what kind of performance drain I get. Anyone have SETI and Genome running together on the same box? What kind of slowdown do you get in the WU's?
Pete

[-=Narcissus=-]

Uh oh. There goes my top spot.

Great to have you with us Pete, and I'm sure your presence will be felt very soon!

I don't use S@H at the same time as G@H, but since both programs use every spare cpu flop, I guess the performance hit will be 50% on both S@H and G@H. This is unless (of course) one program has a higher priority than the other. I know that it is possible, according to G@H's FAQ.

Currently 13th, we should be 12th sometime tomorrow. Wahoo!

Fred

[Rattledagger]

Welcome to LittleGreenMartians and Ees.

I'm running genome&seti alongside each other. If they have the same priority they're using 50% each. My approach is to run genome as belownormal and seti as idle. Genome will then get most cpu, while seti kicks in then genome tries to connect.

rocketmanx, I see you just passed me in seti@home

Fred, you haven't got the top spot, it's the sub-team Narcissus that's got the top spot.

[Guyver]

I figured out what was causing the drops...

The message reads:


Unrecognized amino acid designation!!!!
15 amino acid number:0


This was on my Linux box this morning, and after work...

I put a simple wrapper around the linux version as well...


while true
do
./ghclient.x
done


Guyv

[-=Narcissus=-]

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size="2">Originally posted by Rattledagger:
Fred, you haven't got the top spot, it's the sub-team Narcissus that's got the top spot.
</font>

Shhh! Let me daydream a little!
Besides, it's my c466 that's making all the difference! Just you wait, if I get into more trouble, I'll ask Mart to join up again with me (a Team Narc member going at it on his own). Yeah, that's right, I have friends in high places, like fourth position in G@H [MU]...

Fred... stopping the childish remarks now .

[-=Narcissus=-]

Strange problem you got there.

Might I suggest you post your problem at the G@H discussion group. All of the programmers are there and might be able to help you. Even if they can't, your feedback will be used for future versions.

Fred

[Liquid Snake]

I just joined. My P133 simply couldn't take SETI anymore. 66hrs a WU.. So I moved it over to Genome. Anyone have any idea how long this will take on such an old machine? All my other machines are still running SETI, and it will stay that way.