Cheating at Seti (again)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RichL
    Restored Super MURCer
    • Apr 2003
    • 1348

    #1

    Cheating at Seti (again)

    I first heard of this ages ago, before I started running Seti on my systems, so didnt take any notice.

    Looks like allegations of cheating have raised their ugly heads again. Is this why Seti@MURC seems to have so few active users? I've gone from 700th place to 400th place inside a week!

    FWIW, theres a petition to Seti to sort the cheats out at :
    Athlon XP-64/3200, 1gb PC3200, 512mb Radeon X1950Pro AGP, Dell 2005fwp, Logitech G5, IBM model M.
  • Guru
    Super MURCer
    • Nov 1999
    • 6018

    #2
    Re: Cheating at Seti (again)

    Originally posted by RichL
    I first heard of this ages ago, before I started running Seti on my systems, so didnt take any notice.

    Looks like allegations of cheating have raised their ugly heads again. Is this why Seti@MURC seems to have so few active users? I've gone from 700th place to 400th place inside a week!

    FWIW, theres a petition to Seti to sort the cheats out at :
    http://www.teamprimerib.com/seti/
    New cheats?

    Give us a link and well post some info on http://www.distributedatmurc.co.uk/
    According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless...

    Comment

    • High_Jumbllama
      Super MURCer
      • Dec 1999
      • 4522

      #3
      Not new.
      It's just the same old techniques that cannot be checked against due to the large amount of data.

      Comment

      • Guru
        Super MURCer
        • Nov 1999
        • 6018

        #4
        Cheating Update

        Finally the admins from SETI@home have started to do something about the cheater accounts. Rickman, leader of SETI@Netherlands, got this email from Dr. David P. Anderson, Project Director :



        Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
        It's taken us a while to get around to it,
        but we'll deal with these guys.
        The first one is definitely a cheater - out of 600K
        results there were only 10K unique workunits.
        We zeroed out his account.

        -- David
        Older info here http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/sec...0269509,00.htm
        According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless...

        Comment

        Working...