Parhelia 2: Late 2002?! (compl. DX9; 0,13µ)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 103er-Fan
    MURCer
    • Jun 2002
    • 320

    #1

    Parhelia 2: Late 2002?! (compl. DX9; 0,13µ)

    Take a look here:
    http://www.gamestar.de/news/hardware/10187/

    It says about the following:
    According some rumours, there will be a completely tuned version of the Parhelia. Matrox wants to make the Parhelia 2 a full DirectX 9 card. A new manufacturing process (0,13µ instead of 0,15µ) will allow higher clock speeds.

    I am wondering if this is true, they didn't mentioned any sources, also GameStar sometime likes to do spread some rumours, but if that would be true, then it would be sad as a Parhelia owner
    Specs:
    MSI 745 Ultra :: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ :: 1024 MB PC-266 DDR-RAM :: HIS Radeon 9700 (Catalyst 3.1) :: Creative Soundblaster Live! 1024 :: Pioneer DVD-106S :: Western Digital WD800BB :: IBM IC35L040AVVN07
  • Slougi
    MURCer
    • Feb 2002
    • 368

    #2
    Re: Parhelia 2: Late 2002?! (compl. DX9; 0,13µ)

    Originally posted by 103er-Fan
    if that would be true, then it would be sad as a Parhelia owner
    wtf? how so?

    Edit: Sorry, I somehow read 2003 instead of 2002....
    -Slougi

    Comment

    • 103er-Fan
      MURCer
      • Jun 2002
      • 320

      #3
      Re: Re: Parhelia 2: Late 2002?! (compl. DX9; 0,13µ)

      Originally posted by Slougi

      wtf? how so?

      Edit: Sorry, I somehow read 2003 instead of 2002....
      Ok, I was talking for myself there.... and it would depend on the speed of the new Parhelia.

      But if it would be around R9700 speeds, with the complete features the current P. offers, I would've been a bt sad that I haven't waited. Oh and of course depends on the price, but I doubt that it would be more expensive than the original P.
      Specs:
      MSI 745 Ultra :: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ :: 1024 MB PC-266 DDR-RAM :: HIS Radeon 9700 (Catalyst 3.1) :: Creative Soundblaster Live! 1024 :: Pioneer DVD-106S :: Western Digital WD800BB :: IBM IC35L040AVVN07

      Comment

      • GT98
        FanBoy
        • Aug 1999
        • 4408

        #4
        I thought that the Fab that makes the Parhelia is skipping .013 and going to .09 in 2003/4?
        Why is it called tourist season, if we can't shoot at them?

        Comment

        • lecter
          Super MURCer
          • May 2002
          • 1467

          #5
          UMC you mean? I thought they already manufacture in 0.13....
          All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

          Comment

          • thop
            Super MURCer
            • Mar 2001
            • 2536

            #6
            hmm interestentintertersting! to say the least.
            it will happen eventually i guess but not late 2002, maybe summer 2003.
            no matrox, no matroxusers.

            Comment

            • Evildead666
              Super MURCer
              • Mar 2002
              • 3116

              #7
              Summer 2003 and with 0.09µ probably...
              0.13µ is IN now (as in the thing to have) and i suspect they'll just go for the next refresh...Full DX9, 0.09µ, and 300Mhz core or +
              they might even go for a memory change (DDR-II or something else...)

              I doubt we'll see anything this year, too soon after the launch of the current parhelia, but with the sales being what they are (pretty low i suppoe, no stats)
              PC-1 Fractal Design Arc Mini R2, 3800X, Asus B450M-PRO mATX, 2x8GB B-die@3800C16, AMD Vega64, Seasonic 850W Gold, Black Ice Nemesis/Laing DDC/EKWB 240 Loop (VRM>CPU>GPU), Noctua Fans.
              Nas : i3/itx/2x4GB/8x4TB BTRFS/Raid6 (7 + Hotspare) Xpenology
              +++ : FSP Nano 800VA (Pi's+switch) + 1600VA (PC-1+Nas)

              Comment

              • Nappe1
                MURCer
                • Jul 2000
                • 561

                #8
                okay, so here's my dimes to this pot...

                to me these news really don't bring anything new on the light. we all know (or I thought so) that Matrox is Skipping to 0.09µm (and not to 0.13µm as said in the article.) and we all know also that it is a way too early talk about their next generation Hardware. IMO, it's way too far away. (HEY! we are talking about something like 8 to 10 Months here! so calm down a bit. )

                But I am not saying that they couldn't do something before showing new generation chip...
                "Dippadai"

                Comment

                • yuppi
                  mini MURCer
                  • Jun 2002
                  • 55

                  #9
                  Did anyone prove that it's a .15 chip?
                  I mean, didn't no one remove the heatspreader? ;-)
                  Maybe they but a HS on the die because it would be to small for a .15 process and someone might have noticed this ;-)

                  Comment

                  • P5ycho
                    MURCer
                    • May 2000
                    • 280

                    #10
                    what do you want to do when you remove the heatspreader, put it under a electron-microscope? you cant see the manufacturing process from the outside you know...

                    Comment

                    • Claymonkey
                      Super MURCer
                      • Dec 2000
                      • 1871

                      #11
                      I really hope they can fix the P and show people up. As much as I love Matrox cards I was VERY disappointed with the P, and they are charging WAY to much for it.
                      Wikipedia and Google.... the needles to my tangent habit.
                      ________________________________________________

                      That special feeling we get in the cockles of our hearts, Or maybe below the cockles, Maybe in the sub-cockle area, Maybe in the liver, Maybe in the kidneys, Maybe even in the colon, We don't know.

                      Comment

                      • CaineTanathos
                        MURCer
                        • May 2002
                        • 284

                        #12
                        Well remember the g200 was the first of the series
                        1 year later they release the g400/max

                        just a thought maybe the parhelia-512 chip is the first version too
                        Hey! You're talking to me all wrong! It's the wrong tone! Do it again...and I'll stab you in the face with a soldering iron

                        Comment

                        • P5ycho
                          MURCer
                          • May 2000
                          • 280

                          #13
                          yes, its the first chip of a new generation, so in about a year you'll see a more mature Parhelia.

                          Comment

                          • VigilAnt
                            MURC Writer
                            • Jan 2002
                            • 138

                            #14
                            Be patient, and I will post up information with regards to this and many other issues at www.murc.ws.

                            VigilAnt
                            VigilAnt

                            Comment

                            • GNEP
                              Super MURCer
                              • Feb 2002
                              • 5241

                              #15
                              Ooooh - things must be hotting up Haven't seen VigilAnt around in a while
                              DM says: Crunch with Matrox Users@ClimatePrediction.net

                              Comment

                              Working...