Anyone seen a lost Beagle.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brian Ellis
    Super MURCer
    • Sep 1999
    • 9623

    #16
    What I have never understood is that the device is supposed to land ± flat on the surface, so that the transmissions are sent out normal to the surface. What if a small rock tilts it?
    Brian (the devil incarnate)

    Comment

    • The PIT
      Super MURCer
      • Aug 1999
      • 11901

      #17
      Originally posted by Brian Ellis
      What I have never understood is that the device is supposed to land ± flat on the surface, so that the transmissions are sent out normal to the surface. What if a small rock tilts it?
      The single gets broadcast in the wrong direction which was one of the problems mentioned on the BBC article. Looks like it's a gonna though.
      Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
      Weather nut and sad git.

      My Weather Page

      Comment

      • Brian Ellis
        Super MURCer
        • Sep 1999
        • 9623

        #18
        Latest news http://www.beagle2.com/news/index.htm
        Brian (the devil incarnate)

        Comment

        • Jammrock
          The Berserker
          • Aug 1999
          • 8661

          #19
          Despite more than 30 missions launched to the Red Planet since the 1960s, only three landers have ever reached the Martian surface successfully.
          The world's tax money at good use.

          Jammrock
          “Inside every sane person there’s a madman struggling to get out”
          –The Light Fantastic, Terry Pratchett

          Comment

          • KvHagedorn
            Super MURCer
            • Aug 1999
            • 10725

            #20
            Two of those were the Viking Landers in 1976, back when NASA was still worth a damn. If you are going to do something, you might as well do it right.

            Comment

            • Technoid
              Super MURCer
              • Sep 1999
              • 7645

              #21
              And as I erlier stated:

              Marvin must be up there with a mobile SAM station
              If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.

              Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."

              Comment

              • The PIT
                Super MURCer
                • Aug 1999
                • 11901

                #22
                Perhaps they have more success with a manned mission.
                Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
                Weather nut and sad git.

                My Weather Page

                Comment

                • gt40
                  This space for rent
                  • Sep 1999
                  • 3973

                  #23
                  Let me be the first to volounteer, this planet is boring me.
                  Yeah, well I'm gonna build my own lunar space lander! With blackjack aaaaannd Hookers! Actually, forget the space lander, and the blackjack. Ahhhh forget the whole thing!

                  Comment

                  • Wombat
                    Super MURCer
                    • Aug 2000
                    • 9498

                    #24
                    Originally posted by KvHagedorn
                    Two of those were the Viking Landers in 1976, back when NASA was still worth a damn. If you are going to do something, you might as well do it right.
                    If they had the funding. Don't forget that Viking was a billion dollar project. They never get that kind of money these days.
                    Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

                    Comment

                    • KvHagedorn
                      Super MURCer
                      • Aug 1999
                      • 10725

                      #25
                      It's way more than funding.. it's attitude. But yes, they need the money to do it right.

                      Comment

                      • GT98
                        FanBoy
                        • Aug 1999
                        • 4408

                        #26
                        Originally posted by The PIT
                        Perhaps they have more success with a manned mission.
                        Still have to figure out that damn pesky radition problem they have when they leave earth
                        Why is it called tourist season, if we can't shoot at them?

                        Comment

                        • cjolley
                          Super MURCer
                          • Aug 1999
                          • 7672

                          #27
                          I think it's great if it failed.
                          Why?
                          Because we try it again...
                          and again.....
                          and again.....
                          and again.....
                          and again.....
                          and again.....
                          and again.....
                          and again.....

                          Why?
                          Well, that just what's great about it.
                          I can't explain it.
                          But it is.
                          chuck
                          Chuck
                          秋音的爸爸

                          Comment

                          Working...