Small is better?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fat Tone
    Super MURCer
    • Aug 1999
    • 7579

    #31
    OH silly me - I never thought of that.

    Beleive me, after a few years of marriage, when the mammaries are heading south and the wife has turned into a nag-monster, you'll see my reason as a bigger advantage
    FT.

    Comment

    • LvR
      Super MURCer
      • Jun 2000
      • 1570

      #32
      Cannot see any benefit in your preferred situation I am afraid - been married 19 years myself and with the mammaries going south, at least in my case I don't run the risk of the outlet of the nag-monster ending up at ear level and therefore bothering me in my old-age!
      Lawrence

      Comment

      • Drizzt
        Super MURCer
        • Oct 1999
        • 1314

        #33
        Mine hase no mammaries
        (first time to me, I was used to *at least* big breasts)
        Sat on a pile of deads, I enjoy my oysters.

        Comment

        • LvR
          Super MURCer
          • Jun 2000
          • 1570

          #34
          I was used to *at least* big breasts
          That as opposed to? ...................... monstrous?
          Lawrence

          Comment

          • Drizzt
            Super MURCer
            • Oct 1999
            • 1314

            #35
            Dunno if I have explained badly...
            All girls I have had up to now had big breast, this has...look by yourself

            (taken with the cellular, sorry for the poor quality)
            Attached Files
            Sat on a pile of deads, I enjoy my oysters.

            Comment

            • Fat Tone
              Super MURCer
              • Aug 1999
              • 7579

              #36
              Maybe no breasts, but no flabby stomach either!
              FT.

              Comment

              Working...