I have a patent on two opposing hammocks that are spring loaded for zero-g sex. The sides are tied together with soft springs and the ends are springs. All you have to do is iniitiate movement and you never stop. There is even an option for a motor and remote control to vary the frequency and amplitude.
-
-
Somebody better have a huge pot of callous cream handy around that setup.........Originally posted by Brian R.
I have a patent on two opposing hammocks that are spring loaded for zero-g sex. The sides are tied together with soft springs and the ends are springs. All you have to do is iniitiate movement and you never stop. There is even an option for a motor and remote control to vary the frequency and amplitude.
LawrenceComment
-
-
I'm amazed it isn't more.
Comment
-
(I can't believe I'm dignifying this thread with a response)
I can't believe everyone is just answering with yes or no (well, mostly no
).
I would think the issue (bra or not) depends largely on the woman at hand (-> as a figure of speech
). I can imagine women that would look better without 
, but on the other hand there probabely are those we'd like to see cover up as much as possible 
... Or that just *need* the support. 
Just my 2 cents...
JörgComment
-
I think the lack of gravity would compliment any woman, and as such, support would not be required.Yeah, well I'm gonna build my own lunar space lander! With blackjack aaaaannd Hookers! Actually, forget the space lander, and the blackjack. Ahhhh forget the whole thing!Comment
-
Well what did you expect from the MURC?Originally posted by Lizzard[MPE]
Im not amazed this has gotten 3 pages.
Comment
-
There are some women who, without gravity, would stick out 3 or 4 feet.Comment
-
Wouldn't that be an interesting sight.Comment
-
Whats wrong dear - chastity belt on a little too tight lately?Originally posted by Lizzard[MPE]
Im not amazed this has gotten 3 pages.
LawrenceComment
Comment