-
Yeah, well I'm gonna build my own lunar space lander! With blackjack aaaaannd Hookers! Actually, forget the space lander, and the blackjack. Ahhhh forget the whole thing! -
NOT work safe, hehe.
Titanium is the new bling!
(you heard from me first!) -
Maybe someone can make an animated gif from one of the 'bra' versions for an av
Yeah, well I'm gonna build my own lunar space lander! With blackjack aaaaannd Hookers! Actually, forget the space lander, and the blackjack. Ahhhh forget the whole thing!Comment
-
*sniff* that's beautiful. ahem.Wikipedia and Google.... the needles to my tangent habit.
________________________________________________
That special feeling we get in the cockles of our hearts, Or maybe below the cockles, Maybe in the sub-cockle area, Maybe in the liver, Maybe in the kidneys, Maybe even in the colon, We don't know.Comment
-
haha, yeah, not work safe. Entertaining though.
"I dream of a better world where chickens can cross the road without having their motives questioned."Comment
-
Possibly?Originally posted by gt40Possibly not work safe
Chuck
秋音的爸爸
Comment
-
All in the name of science, which surely should be tolerable in a mature work environmentOriginally posted by cjolleyPossibly?
Yeah, well I'm gonna build my own lunar space lander! With blackjack aaaaannd Hookers! Actually, forget the space lander, and the blackjack. Ahhhh forget the whole thing!Comment
-
So in the scenario I put in (D cup, light activity) their model shows that the nude, unsupported breasts bounce LESS than those in a regular underwire bra. WTF? Also I note with some displeasure that the "normal bra" they use is one of those "gigantic 1950's bra" models.
Ok, then I tried the A cup. First of all, those are the SCARIEST A cups I've ever seen. Secondly... AGAIN the regular bra actually INCREASED the jiggle. I'm thinking... that this is rigged. *snicker*The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!
I'm the least you could do
If only life were as easy as you
I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
If only life were as easy as you
I would still get screwedComment
-
Hmm, gonna have to do more research.Originally posted by GurmSo in the scenario I put in (D cup, light activity) their model shows that the nude, unsupported breasts bounce LESS than those in a regular underwire bra. WTF? Also I note with some displeasure that the "normal bra" they use is one of those "gigantic 1950's bra" models.
Ok, then I tried the A cup. First of all, those are the SCARIEST A cups I've ever seen. Secondly... AGAIN the regular bra actually INCREASED the jiggle. I'm thinking... that this is rigged. *snicker*Yeah, well I'm gonna build my own lunar space lander! With blackjack aaaaannd Hookers! Actually, forget the space lander, and the blackjack. Ahhhh forget the whole thing!Comment
-
I can take a surprising length of time to check all permutations...but worth the effort!FT.Comment
-
Originally posted by GurmSo in the scenario I put in (D cup, light activity) their model shows that the nude, unsupported breasts bounce LESS than those in a regular underwire bra. WTF? Also I note with some displeasure that the "normal bra" they use is one of those "gigantic 1950's bra" models.
Ok, then I tried the A cup. First of all, those are the SCARIEST A cups I've ever seen. Secondly... AGAIN the regular bra actually INCREASED the jiggle. I'm thinking... that this is rigged. *snicker*
I think it's a lighting thing.
try it in wireframe mode, and also try switching views.
The "1950's" bra doesn't do much, but it does dampen the amplitude a shade.Yeah, well I'm gonna build my own lunar space lander! With blackjack aaaaannd Hookers! Actually, forget the space lander, and the blackjack. Ahhhh forget the whole thing!Comment
-
I just spotted a typo - I should have started with it can take... but I don't think it was too far wrong anyway
FT.Comment
Comment