3DMark2001 out TODAY!

[SteveC]

mmmm Score of 926 on my brother's P3-550/G450/128Mb/Win2k machine... Looks like I'll have to borrow loads of graphics cards again and do a load more tests....

------------------
Cheers,
Steve

"Life is what we make of it, yet most of us just fake"

[SteveC]

Oh, by the way - what if game 4? My matrox G4x0's can't run it. 'Not Supported In Hardware' or something.

------------------
Cheers,
Steve

"Life is what we make of it, yet most of us just fake"

[Topha]

steve: i think game 4 is the nature scene they show in the demo. cant run it either, but thats what i heard. there is a screenshot with a man fishing on the madonion page, looks really cool.
i ran the demo at 1024 and got about 1fps.

cant wait for the cebit, i want my g800

[DentyCracker]

AMD Duron *edit* 700@950* edit
Abit KT7
256 MB RAM
Matrox Millennium G400 Dualhead 32 MB
Windows Me-Windows 2000
DirectX 8.0-DirectX8.0a
6.50 Drivers-5.51 Drivers


D3D Software T&L
1024x768
Depth: 32 bit
Z-Buffering: 32 bit
Texture Format: 32 bit
Buffering: Double

3DMark Score: 1341-1343

Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail - 23.3-23.1 fps
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail - 7.7-7.9 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail - 20.6-20.4 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail - 8.2-8.3 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail - 27.9-28.2 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail - 15.3-15.2 fps
Game 4 - Nature - Not supported by hardware
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) - 117.7 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) - 133.9 MTexels/s
High Polygon Count (1 Light) - 3.0 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 Lights) - 1.3 MTriangles/s
Environment Bump Mapping - 19.8 fps
DOT3 Bump Mapping - Not supported by hardware
Vertex Shader - 18.0 fps
Pixel Shader - Not supported by hardware
Point Sprites - 1.0 MSprites/s


The demo is sweet
*edit* Must have been very tired whein I first typed this *edit*

Windows 2000 score identical to WinMe, very interesting

[This message has been edited by DentyCracker (edited 14 March 2001).]

[This message has been edited by DentyCracker (edited 16 March 2001).]

[Ad_B]

D3D Software T&L
1024x768
Depth: 32 bit
Z-Buffering: 32 bit
Texture Format: 32 bit
Buffering: Double
3DMark Score: 1847

Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail - 33.4 fps
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail - 13.1 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail - 27.0 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail - 10.6 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail - 36.8 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail - 20.1 fps
Game 4 - Nature - Not supported by hardware
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) - 149.6 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) - 182.8 MTexels/s
High Polygon Count (1 Light) - 3.6 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 Lights) - 1.9 MTriangles/s
Environment Bump Mapping - 22.7 fps
DOT3 Bump Mapping - Not supported by hardware
Vertex Shader - 20.6 fps
Pixel Shader - Not supported by hardware
Point Sprites - 1.1 MSprites/s

Athlon T-Bird 1Ghz @ 1.22Ghz (111x11)
256 Mb 133Mhz Cas 3 @ 148 Mhz Cas 2
Abit KT7
and the all important G400 Max @ 167/222
Win2k SP1
Direct X 8.0a

EDIT: Latest Matrox Drivers/Via 4.29 4in1's


[This message has been edited by Ad_B (edited 14 March 2001).]

[Electric Amish]

WOOHOO!!

630 default bench on my TNT2 M64 here at work running in a Dell 1ghz.

No Dot3, No EMBM, No Game 4.

1088 on my Geforce 256 32mb, default bench, running on a Dell 733.

amish

[This message has been edited by Electric Amish (edited 14 March 2001).]

[isochar]

For those of you who haven't already...

RUN THE DEMO! (The benchmark is only half of things to come )

The nature scene is jaw-dropping! Not to mention the Matrixesque scene gets a few eye-candy additions at the end...

[Jorden]

Been trying to get onto the download page for the past 15 minutes, but even that's not possible. Getting a Page not Found error all the time

Jord.

[isochar]

Try download.com or zdnet.com (probably the largest user capacities of all the available download servers)

ftp://ftp.zdnet.com/threedee/tweakfiles/benchmark/3DMark2001.exe

http://download.cnet.com/downloads/0...st-7-1.5122338

ftp://ftp.download.com/pub/win95/games/tools-editors/3DMark2001.exe

[alessandro]

It seems from the other forums in the net that ATI cards are doing VERY well.
Even my Radeon beats GF2Ultra's scores.
It might be that the Radeons have better DX8 implementation than the GF2 chip.
I'm looking forward for any KyroII's 3dmarks and of course GF3's ones that should be very good considering the fact that 3DMark 2001 is made for this card.

[alessandro]

Radeon 32DDR 183/183 with no registry tweak at this time.



I turn-off some background programs in my memmory since last time.



------------------
Athlon Thunderbird 1.1Ghz@1.2~1.3+GHz Socket A 256Kb,Asus A7V dipswitches,GlobalWin FOP32-1 heatsink,GlobalWin 802 Advance ATX Case, 17" Sony Multiscan 200PST,384MB Crucial PC133 CAS=2,ATI Radeon 32Mb DDR,(Matrox Millenium G400 MAX 32MB 5ns SGRAM),IBM Deskstar 75GXP 15Gb UltraATA/100, Quantum Firebal EL 10.2Gb,Hewlett Packard DeskJet 970Cxi,Sound blaster Live!,Cambridge Soundworks 5.1,Creative PC-DVD 5X,CDR-RW Ricoh MP7040S@MP7060S(Tweaked from 4x--->6x with no problem),Adaptec SCSI 2920C,Diamond SupraExpress 56e PRO,Iomega Zip Drive.

[drzaius]

what are you all running the benchmark in? 1024x768x16 with 16bit zbuffer/texture, No FSAA double frame buffer? or have we all gone to 1024x768x32 with 32bit zbuffer/texture, no FSAA and double frame buffer?

just wanna know before i post my mark (not that's going to be amazing or anything, just wanna know)

------------------
Slow people as easy to pass, it's people who drive fast that are hard.

[Topha]

when i start it it asks me to change settings to 1024x768 everything 32bit, thats what i did, guess thats the new defaul settings.

question: when i set everything to 16 bit, res at 640x480, there is no speed improvement, it actually seems slower. anyone know why?

[Greebe]

Guess the MURC now stands for...
Mini Users Resource Center

[rylan]

Greebe: Funny.. but still somehow sad