Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Overclocked Parhelia scores

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I get a quite decent overall score on 3DMark: 7836.
    However my Environment Bumb Mapping score is very low: ~87 FPS.

    Here is my 3DMark results:




    Just deleted my attachment by accident
    Last edited by Mikko; 22 October 2002, 08:51.

    Comment


    • #32
      Edit line 16 to remove your serial number....
      Let us return to the moon, to stay!!!

      Comment


      • #33
        lines 6 and 8 are different between the 2 cards but that is all i can spot try changing the codes if you feel brave to see if it makes a difference
        is a flower best picked in it's prime or greater withered away by time?
        Talk about a dream, try to make it real.

        Comment


        • #34
          The only differences I note between yours and mine are:

          Line 6: 0x0550 on yours and 0x04D9 on mine
          Line 8: 0x0004 on yours and 0x0001 on mine
          Line10: 0x830A on yours and 0x030A on mine
          Line28: '403' on yours and '402' on mine
          Let us return to the moon, to stay!!!

          Comment


          • #35
            I just tried the pinsfile, which was put here by Borat (on page 2). Even if it will help Borat to get 150 fps on EMBM, it didn't help me at all. The results on 3DMark were pretty much the same than before with my original pinsfile.

            I am now quite convinced that the main reason for poor EMBM performance has something to do with Ali Magik -chipset.

            Well, I don't want to think about it too much, because the overall performance of my Parhelia is very good. Unless someone can make some kind of patch/fix for a problem, I will move on with my life

            Comment


            • #36
              Mikko - see my response in the other thread - ALi Magik does the same for me
              DM says: Crunch with Matrox Users@ClimatePrediction.net

              Comment


              • #37
                Yes, I noticed that. So sad...

                Comment


                • #38
                  9324 but not overclocked.

                  9324

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Why are over half your tests not there?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Maybe he's a busy person and hasn't got time to stare at some dumb 3DMark No, although that is the hardcore overclocking Markaholic's way to run 3DMark - only run the tests that affect the final 3DMark score because you fear that your computer will crash in some of the later tests - for this thread it might be better to run all tests so people can better compare their card's results, especially that famous bump mapping score.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        I will run the full test suite. I normally only run the bench requirements.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          WHAT?! YOU DON'T LIKE THE UNICORN OR OTHER PRETTY PICTURES ON 3DMARK?!?!?

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Same here, I only run the real benchmarks, it's a waste of time to stare at everything else....over and over again!
                            All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Full test results for the curious...

                              9308

                              I can go higher but these are my everyday stock system settings for gaming and work.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Still very impressive scores, and a very impressive system.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X