Tweet
4565
Its more like a system mark now, even includes the effects of ones soundcard.
~~DukeP~~
Its more like a system mark now, even includes the effects of ones soundcard.
~~DukeP~~
-
-
DukeP, represents the 'Radeon 9500 (np)' in your Futuremark profile a 'non pro' card?Last edited by JaG; 12 February 2003, 05:52.Comment
-
Lol 8500 got 8747 points? Cheating or just some accident? Lol...P4 Northwood 1.8GHz@2.7GHz 1.65V Albatron PX845PEV Pro
Running two Dell 2005FPW 20" Widescreen LCD
And of course, Matrox Parhelia | My Matrox histroy: Mill-I, Mill-II, Mystique, G400, ParheliaComment
-
Dunno, could be an error since the score sounds about right for a 8500LE in 3DMark 2001...Comment
-
Or 3D Analyze User? *g*Originally posted by WyWyWyWy
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=40920
Lol 8500 got 8747 points? Cheating or just some accident? Lol...System:
P III-S 1.4@1.52
512 MB SDR-Ram
Gigabyte-6IEML
Matrox Parhelia
Comment
-
According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless..
.Comment
-
P4 Northwood 1.8GHz@2.7GHz 1.65V Albatron PX845PEV Pro
Running two Dell 2005FPW 20" Widescreen LCD
And of course, Matrox Parhelia | My Matrox histroy: Mill-I, Mill-II, Mystique, G400, ParheliaComment
-
Without any cheating my Parhelia get just over 9000. Thing is the 3rd 3D Test and the 2nd CPU test are just black screens.Comment
-
lol i am not even going to bother downloading and trying this new benchmark on my laptop. i think i would be able to run one test or something. i will just have to wait until the m10 comes out
Dell Inspiron 8200
Pentium4m 1.6
640mb pc2100
64mb gf440go
15" uxga ultrasharp
40gb 5400rpm hdd 16mb cacheComment
-
Dang, my 8500 (flashed with 9100 bios) just doesn't want to o/c.
Bumped it up just 5 MHz to 280/280 and was able to get 999 3DBarfs, although started showing some o/c'ing artifacts during the last sound test. Backed it back down to 275/275 and managed to get 981 : http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=33581
Comment
-
Submit it Steve!
Just for a bit of fun.P4 Northwood 1.8GHz@2.7GHz 1.65V Albatron PX845PEV Pro
Running two Dell 2005FPW 20" Widescreen LCD
And of course, Matrox Parhelia | My Matrox histroy: Mill-I, Mill-II, Mystique, G400, ParheliaComment
-
After running it a bit, I think the artifacts I was getting at 280/280 weren't really from the video card after all. Used powerstrip to make 640x480 the highest resolution the monitor would support and got my score over 1300 at the default 275/275, but it started glitching on the silent part of the sound test... the program isn't all that stable it seems. No heat problems at all, case temperatures are only 75 degrees (24c).Comment
-
so, do you guys think it is a good benchmark?
I would personally like more dx9 tests and a bit more variety,technological speaking (test2 and test3 are basically run on the same 3d-engine, AFAIK), especially if this is going to last until dx10 arrives.
they only uses dx9-exclusive features in one test, and only a little, and what about ps3.0 and vs3.0 (yeah, i know there isn´t any hardware that supports it yet, but I thought futuremark would make it a bit futureproof, and it is in the dx9-spec afterall)
do you think it is advanced enough for future dx9 cards?Last edited by TdB; 12 February 2003, 13:52.This sig is a shameless atempt to make my post look bigger.Comment
-
i think when parhelia dx 9 drivers are out we will see slightly better scores from it , ie 1500 - 2000is a flower best picked in it's prime or greater withered away by time?
Talk about a dream, try to make it real.Comment
-
Yes.Originally posted by JaG
DukeP, represents the 'Radeon 9500 (np)' in your Futuremark profile a 'non pro' card?
~~DukeP~~Comment
Comment