AquaMark

[K6-III]

Originally posted by DentyCracker
Damn you K6III. Your fast processor is keeping you ahead of me. Kicked yo' azz in minimum frame rate and GFX score though
Doubt whether my P can run at 236/308 though. Will try but I'm sure it will crash

My processor would be even faster if I was still running my old Epox 8K3A+ with all its friendly voltages instead of my new Abit NF7 rev1.0 that I got for $30.

I should go even higher with a nice voltmod...as this chip tops out closer to 2.5ghz...

Anyway, best of luck in passing me up...

[TransformX]

14k (+small change)

win2k sp4
Athlon xp @ 1600Mhz
Geforce 4800 (128MB, no overclock)
1GB ddr 333
asus a7v333

[Che Guevara]

about 16000 points, not bad for a P3 I think...

...and, just like in codecreatures, again faster than my brothers p4 2,4 Ghz + Ti 4200 woooohooo!!!
Praise the Parhelia

[GNEP]

Just been running it to measure my system before pushing the clocks a little above stock.

Athlon XP 2000+ (at 1666MHz i.e. stock), 512Mb DDR @133FSB and a Parhelia Retail at stock.

Around about 18k points.

Funny thing about it though for benchmarking your system against itself - the main point of any benchmark IMHO - I am getting some "funny" results. Like someone mentioned above, it's not great for repeatability.

My scores are EITHER 18000ish (+/- 30pts), OR 17500ish (+/- 30pts). Using about 15 runs with the EXACTLY the same machine settings, it randomly gives me either the lower range or the upper range, with about a 60% chance of it being in the lower range. There doesn't seem to be any other influencing factor at work here - not temp driven; not dependent on reboot - it can even do 2 of each range within 1 program session running the benchmarks back-to-back, in no particalar order....

And as those of you who've used it know, the score at the end is split GFX/CPU. It's the GFX part of the score that is driving the high/low score. The CPU part is pretty consistent (to within <0.5%). If I get a chance I will investigate the (rather large) log files to see if I can pinpoint the underlying place(s) where this swing is happening.

Odd.

Anyway - highest so far is 18,059. We'll see how much it rises when I play around with my CPU/mem clocks.

G

[DentyCracker]

I always thought it was Willesden Green

[DentyCracker]

I've more or less given up on beating K6-III. Can't seem to manage more than 20,600 with my P on the edge of stability.

[Catweasel]

Only 19438 with my Radeon 8500@9100

Best regards,
Swen

[Duty]

10k - Wonder if I can get it to go faster?

system:
DFI NFUltra II
AMD 2800+ (2.14 ghz)
1gb DDR 400 CL3
GeForce 4 440 MX (64 mb)

[Che Guevara]

@Duty

Faster?
New graphic card needed

[dbdg]

Originally posted by Che Guevara
@Duty

Faster?
New graphic card needed

10k does seem really low for your rig, is the card really that bad.

[J1NG]

24503.

Although it wasn't the G200. It just wouldn't run whatever I did. So for several benches, pulled the fastest card in the house. A Sapphire Radeon 9600 Pro.

Stock speeds. Sorry, I just can not overclock anything on this new system, not because I won't do it, it's because I don't wanna fry anything!

J1NG

[XHotKolaX]

http://hotkoala.smartneighborhood.net/Aquamark.jpg

[knirfie]

33900, as i already posted in my other thread dbdg, i think your score's a bit low.

[TransformX]

>21,000

Athlon XP 1621Mhz (1800+ oc to 141Mhz FSB)
1GB 333Mhz
BFGTech Asylum Gffx 5600 ultra (128MB)

edit: 22,047 to be precise

[dbdg]

I'll try again in a moment, slightly updated rig now.