(Read the following and then read why I agree with Elie's statement and a better explanation of what I meant in my previous message.)
I wrote previously: "My best friend owns a video production studio and couldn't believe the quality I was getting out of my little $1000 camcorder. Compared it to his Canon XL-1 and couldn't discern a difference"
Elie replied: "Here's where I have to disagree with you unfortunately
The XL1 is a 3CCD cam which uses the pixel shift technology to produce superb image quality especially under low light.
There is no way you can compare a single CCD cam to a 3CCD 1/3 cam, also the optics on the Canon are far more superior than that of Sony's.
It's like saying vhs is just as good as SVHS."
I totally agree with Elie. I should have explained better what my friend did to compare the image between his XL-1 and my D8.
He took a finished commercial he had shot with the XL-1 and outputted it from his non-linear editing system to my D8 camcorder and then to his XL-1 via firewire.
When he played back the footage from my D8 camcorder and then from his XL-1 on a monitor, he could barely notice a difference, if any. I agree that it is true that footage *SHOT* with my D8 will never look as good as footage shot with his XL-1.
For me, the D8 was an economical way to go "digital" and I've been extremely pleased with it since.
I wrote previously: "My best friend owns a video production studio and couldn't believe the quality I was getting out of my little $1000 camcorder. Compared it to his Canon XL-1 and couldn't discern a difference"
Elie replied: "Here's where I have to disagree with you unfortunately
The XL1 is a 3CCD cam which uses the pixel shift technology to produce superb image quality especially under low light.
There is no way you can compare a single CCD cam to a 3CCD 1/3 cam, also the optics on the Canon are far more superior than that of Sony's.
It's like saying vhs is just as good as SVHS."
I totally agree with Elie. I should have explained better what my friend did to compare the image between his XL-1 and my D8.
He took a finished commercial he had shot with the XL-1 and outputted it from his non-linear editing system to my D8 camcorder and then to his XL-1 via firewire.
When he played back the footage from my D8 camcorder and then from his XL-1 on a monitor, he could barely notice a difference, if any. I agree that it is true that footage *SHOT* with my D8 will never look as good as footage shot with his XL-1.
For me, the D8 was an economical way to go "digital" and I've been extremely pleased with it since.
Comment