Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Capturing old video

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Dunno whether it's relevant, but one of the problems with old tapes is that the polyester support shrinks slightly, This makes the wind-on on the reel tighter and exacerbates print-through. It might help simply by rewinding the tape at daily intervals for a week or two (although this will not help the print-through). It is a good idea to rewind VHS tapes systematically every few months (easy the say this after the event ) to keep them in good condition and to not store them in either a low- or a high-humidity environment (40 - 70 RH is ideal) or an environment with large changes of temperature or humidity. If tapes are subjected to extremes of either, rewind them immediately and again 24 hours after normal environments are restored. Of course, all this is independent of degradation of the magnetic remanence, which should not be serious in under 10 years or so. Thin tapes (long play) are worse than thicker ones for all these problems. Archives should always be recorded on the thickest base possible: better to spill a film over to a second tape than try to squeeze it on to a single one, if permanence is likely to be an issue.
    Brian (the devil incarnate)

    Comment


    • #17
      bogieman: Actually, if I am understanding things correctly, this _isn't_ a Matrox forum. It's a general desktop video forum that is sort of attached to MURC somehow.

      Thanks for the information about the SCC. I was actually planning on ordering it since, unfortunately, the one Rick sent didn't work. Nice to hear you had good luck with it.

      Brian: That's interesting about video tapes. I don't have a very extensive collection, mostly just odds and ends I've taped over the years. Even so, I can't imagine rewinding them all every few months! I'll be glad when I get these on CDs. Then I just need to worry about transfering them when the prevailing media changes.

      Thanks,

      Michelle

      Comment


      • #18
        Well, I just went and ordered this. I sure hope it works.

        Thanks,

        Michelle

        Originally posted by Dr Mordrid
        The SIMA Color Corrector (SCC) is a better option as it's got a more juice than the CopyMaster and isn't that much more expensive at about $99 USD. Please note the comments by VideoGuys on the link I'm providing re: SCC vs. CopyMaster.

        SCC: http://www.videoguys.com/sima.htm

        Dr. Mordrid

        Comment


        • #19
          Will be keeping an eye out here, hopefully people let us know how the SCC works out as I'm also one of those with mass quantities of old tapes (slp) that are basically impossible to capture atm.
          mmedia pc: 2x2.4/533 xeons@3.337ghz, asus pc-dl, 2g pc3500 ddram, 27g primary, 2x120 WD's, promise fastrack100, matrox g400-tv, hercules soundcard Server box: p4 1.4GHz, asus p4t, 1g ecc rdram, 27.3g primary, 3x80g maxtors, promise fastrack66, radeon ve, soundblaster Beat box: p3 500, asus p3bf6, 1024meg pc100, 45g primary, 3x45g maxtors, soundblaster, radeon ve, dazzle vcII

          Comment


          • #20
            I'm interested to how the SCC turns out as well, since the guy I spoke to at VideoGuys told me it was because I had a low end capture card. Good luck to you! If that fixes your captures then I'll be one step closer to optical archival bliss!

            Chris

            Comment

            Working...
            X